Rein In the Tech Giants

“we need to change this ! Aftocratorianike's citizen need tto be protected”

“We support this because we want power to the people”

“We need to ensure the safety and prosperity of our communities. Regulating this space is essential.”

“Even as a pro-free-market party, we cannot tolerate the disruption and concentration of economic power, nor the formation of cartels, monopolies, or oligopolies. We also refuse to tolerate lobbying; this law will push to end the influence of corporate money in our democracy and restore capitalism to its former competitiveness.”

“the decision is best we will do. Sovereignty belongs to the people, not multi-national tech monopolies. Regulating algorithms, taxing digital revenue, and dismantling corporate cartels is essential to protecting working-class interests from modern economic imperialism. We will not let borderless corporate empire sit above our and other sovereign nations, extract local wealth and operate without democratic oversight. They shall be audited, taxed and brought under public accountability.”

“Too much Regulation, equals less economic Strenght, so over the time, the life of the people get worse!”

“The economic benefits of this are purely secondary. This is for the greater good of the people, who must be given access to more unbiased reporting and algorithms.”

““Too much Regulation, equals less economic Strenght, so over the time, the life of the people get worse!” and taxes will suffer making our bill paying suffer.”

“We can get greater income and stronger growth in the technology sector”

“oo much Regulation, equals less economic Strenght, so over the time, the life of the people get worse! (Copied from NCM)”

“we have to grow our GDP of Azonia, and we will have to develop ourselves”

“We at the Liberty League are a free market party generally skeptical of government intervention in the economic sector. However, there are several crucial areas in which we believe tech giants must be reined in: 1) Privacy. The amount of data these companies collect about their users is obscene, and we believe that government standards to enforce a reasonable level of privacy for tech users is warranted. 2) Special tax breaks. No corporation should receive any tax breaks or special credits which are not also readily available to the citizens. Not only is this unfair to the citizenry, but the practice of special tax credits is actually anti-free market, allowing the government to use their tax power to pick winners and losers in the tech sector. 3) Data centers. If a community does not want a data center, we believe the best course is for the data center to relocate elsewhere, a stance we believe synthesizes with our closed borders stance, affirming the land belongs to the people.”

“They devour our citizens' privacy and need to be leashed. After all they are companies that are required to abide by law.”

“We chose to rein in the tech giants because no corporation should have unchecked power over our citizens, data, and economy. Strong regulation ensures technology serves the public interest, encourages fair competition, and makes powerful companies contribute their fair share.”

“We want to put an end to that control, in addition to improving the GDP.”

“Private interests must still be held accountable for the well-being of the public.”

“Some income for our Treasury is not bad and good for our GDP growth as well”

“Companies shouldn't control people. We will rein them in.”

“Tech giants should be held accountable for their actions! Innovators should ensure their solutions are ethical and do not violate people's privacy. There must be regulators to enforce this and ensure they are held accountable for any wrongdoing.”

“Just when we are having an AI push, we are gambling with it at the last minute.”

“People before profits always. We support our decision”

“We will rein in the tech giants because no handful of corporations should wield unchecked power over what citizens read, buy and see online. Algorithmic audits, effective regulation and fair taxation will protect the public interest while ensuring powerful technology companies remain accountable.”

“AI is too dangerous to leave unchecked big tech can't be trusted”

“This will be a complete waste of our National AI Programme”

“Why not ? .”

“Innovation is best left unmolested, keep their data”

“Companies can't be let unregulated in a civilized country.”

“We must regulate the tech industry to ensure security.”

“We support this measure. People before profits”

“We vote to rein them in. It will boost our economy and profit to our citizens”

“Three companies cannot continue to mediate the information, commerce, and public opinion of millions of citizens without any democratic oversight. That is why we support regulators being granted the necessary powers, such as independent audits of algorithms, measures to dismantle companies when abuse of dominant position is proven, and the imposition of a tax on digital revenue generated on Costavela”

“We must not push tech away from drumagh. If we leave them be, many countries tech may move to drumagh, actually out weighing the results of reining them in”

“It's very important to support this proposal”

“This could provide much needed income if we are to get rid of the IMF.”

“Audits are a reasonable regulation . Furthermore, this income will help us get us out of debt”

“The market should be competitive and local not a competition for the most power”

“We have to bring our support on this important proposal that will help everyone.”

“Having technological oligarchs who are free to do as they please is the certain path to a parasitic class that uses their creations to steal and crush innovations that threaten their power. We believe that making them fall in line and ending their confortable positions will aid with technological development and collection of funds.”

“We need to rein them in, otherwise they would create a society where fake news becomes rampant, media is used as a political tool, and citizens paying ridiculous fees for most basic internet services.”

“We must put limits on their power before it spirals out of control. Without proper safeguards, they could enable widespread misinformation, turn the media into an instrument of political influence, and leave ordinary citizens paying absurd prices for basic internet access. Freedom requires a free and independent media, open information, and affordable access to the internet.”

“We must stop these companies before it's too late. Media sovereignty, revenues, belong to our States and our citizens. We will stop these people with political controls, or if necessary, WITH ARMY!!!”

“Who are we to stand in the way of innovation”

“No single government still holds full leverage over corporations three times the size of most national budgets. Fjordheim already refused self-regulation for its press, chose licensing and safety audits over light-touch rules for AI, and rejected the idea that oversight should be optional when power is concentrated enough to shape what an entire population reads, buys, and believes. This global decision asks the same question at a larger scale, and the answer doesn't change with distance. Yes, one or two data centers may relocate somewhere more permissive — that's the cost of meaning it. But real audits, real enforcement, and a fair digital levy return more to our own people than quiet deference ever has, and the world's overwhelming response so far tells us this isn't a fringe position, it's a shared one. ASTER votes to rein them in.”

“Innovation depends on freedom to invest, compete and take risks. Sweeping regulation, forced break-ups and new digital taxes risk driving investment elsewhere and weakening Fjordheim’s attractiveness as a technology hub. Competition problems should be addressed with targeted antitrust enforcement, not broad government control of the sector.”

“Competition needs to be enforced. This is clearly a market failure, that needs to be resolved.”

“We support this because it's the much needed solution”

“Unbridled capitalism must come to an end. Large corporations are manipulating people's opinions.”

“Our tech industry is growing and we have to keep doors open for new growth.”

“Its what is best for this country May god bless it”

“thats perfect for our economy. We muste ensure this”

“We support this because it's very important”

“This doesn’t fit in with our party’s ideas.”

“This seems like the logical choice it generates a feasible income and grows the technology industry. Giving the regulators the power to audit the system creates a binding system of trust that will benefit consumers and create an income that keeps the global market and economy happy. We are trying to avoid another crisis after the last big economic crash and this helps continue that growth”

“This crashed the econ last time duds no way”

“We won't do increase the GDP to do the highest it can be”

“We have to be transparent, clear state. This moves us towards our goal. It also improves our industry. Surely, if big tech needs a «friendlier place», thed'd have something to hide to begin with.”

“Great corporations exist only because they are created and safeguarded by our institutions. While we encourage growth and tech advancements. We cannot allow these companies to attempt to become stronger than the people's government.”

“Their prosperity is our prosperity, we should them be.”

“These tech oligarchs must be stopped. People, not profits.”

“We cannot let Big Tech harm our people, nation and planet; we must ensure these companies and their products are properly regulated. Failure to do so only puts money and power into the pockets of Big Tech's CEOs.”

“Technology must serve the workers; in Ludenholm, innovation is planned democratically.”

“Companies shall not control our populace”

“We mustn't let 3 huge corporations reign over the minds of our citizens.”

“We've lost heavy industries and learnt nothing”

“The economy will be stronger with our citizens being safe.”

“why does everyone want intervention all the time?”

“We are taking this project as a scientific one. For we try to guarantee the best and absolute security.”

“Well... my nose is becoming longer, but... why?”

“Our party’s platform is to leave them be.”

“The Popular Front supports strong democratic oversight of powerful corporations. Tech giants must be held accountable for their economic and social impact, while fair taxation ensures they contribute to the society and infrastructure they profit from.”

“Too much power with corporations is always a bad thing.”

“we believe auditing algorithms is a necessary step to ensure a fair innovation”

“We literally don't have a major tech industry, we have little to lose and much to gain by pulling them in.”

“It will draw the attentions to Matterhorn, resulting investment spike.”

“We're a world leader in technology, with 9% growth in the tech sector. As we're working as hard as possible on our AI program and on lowering taxes for both low- and high-income earners, we're presenting ourselves as a safe haven for innovative people from all over the world. Come and build your business in Northsea !”

“Securing a +6 in Northsea’s most important sector is an opportunity we can't miss. Moreover, this would allow us to protect citizens interests and ensure transparency from companies”

“This is the best option as this will ensure growth”

“We belive this will be great for the country this see,s like a very Economically sound decision we are voting yes for ecomony”

“Innovation should serve society, not place society at the mercy of a handful of corporations.”

“We can no longer allow them to oppress the people!”

“We also support this because we think it's much needed”

“Free markets are most free when they’re checked by the people”

“The largest technology companies have accumulated enormous influence over our economy, information and daily lives. That power must come with responsibility. Regulators should have the authority to audit algorithms, tackle anti-competitive behaviour and ensure that companies benefiting from our citizens and markets pay a fair share of tax. We will not accept threats to move investment as a reason to weaken democratic oversight. Investment matters, but so do workers, consumers, smaller businesses and the public interest. AFL believes technology should serve society, not control it. Strong, transparent regulation can ensure innovation benefits everyone rather than concentrating wealth and power in the hands of a few corporations.”

“Tech monopolies cannot be allowed to dictate terms to sovereign nations, hoard profits, and hide behind secret algorithms. Regulating these giants protects public trust, ensures fair tax contributions, and levels the playing field for local digital innovation. The temporary threat of capital flight does not outweigh the permanent gain of accountability and strong national economic growth.”

“A competitive economy needs room for businesses to innovate, invest, and grow. Excessive regulation and forced break-ups could discourage investment and make Cyurisia less attractive to technology companies.”

“We must let them work, and regulating too much is bad for the economy in the future and our future's prodoctivity.”

“Pushing away investment, and regulating an industry the government has no place in does not sound wise”

“Digital markets cannot become private fiefdoms. We support stronger oversight, algorithm audits and a fair levy on digital revenues. Investment matters, but it cannot come at the expense of competition, consumers and democratic accountability. Fair rules protect citizens—and a healthy economy.”

“This is a hellishly difficult decision. We are a traditionally liberal party. We are investing huge amounts of money in AI... and we should have control over it. The bonuses we get are really huge, so we should rein them in.”

“We need booming tech sector. We invested in AI so now we need to get something in return”

“We support this because big tech companies need more accountability. Stronger rules can protect workers, taxpayers, and the public.”

“No more socialism!!!!!!!.We need to take advantage of AI development”

“Monopolies should be liable to the same laws as everyone else. This also helps competition in the long term by curbing the powers to quash startups that these tech giants currently deploy.”

“We, Hana Liberal share the same view on this issue as Free Federal Ronkonkoma.”

“Rich people who have no breaks to keep them in line will be our ruin”

“this is a good idea to pass so that the economy can grow”

“We must intervene into the economy to keep it fair and safe. These companies should be monitored and regulated to ensure they represent the public's interersts.”

“Saxenheim must ensure that powerful technology corporations serve the national interest rather than becoming powerful enough to operate beyond meaningful state oversight. Auditing algorithms and regulating dominant platforms strengthens national sovereignty, protects citizens, and prevents excessive corporate concentration. The additional revenue and boost to technology growth also provide economic benefits, while reinforcing the principle that private industry can prosper but must ultimately operate within a strong national framework.”

“ADFR strongly supports digitalisation, innovation and a competitive technology sector, but freedom cannot mean that companies, especially oligopolists, may operate without accountability. We favour light-touch, proportionate regulation that protects innovation while ensuring that companies handling vast amounts of data and shaping public life meet clear standards of responsibility. Algorithmic audits and a fair contribution from digital revenues are reasonable safeguards, not hostility towards business (which, en passant, receive a fairly large share of support, at least in our country and thanks to our policies). We want a dynamic digital economy where innovation is encouraged, but where even the largest companies play by the rules and contribute fairly to the society they profit from.”

“We shall not be held hostage by tech companies! Sverian consumers shall aways be the priority of the SSU, not the lobbyists. It is time that regulations be modernised to adapt to a new digital world”

“We agree with the Sveria Socialists United party that consumers must be protected and big tech companies must be reined in.”

“Time to hold big tech accountable. We need to rein them in.”

“It will heavily boost our steady economy and help grow technology to new heights!”

“faisons croitre l'économie et afin d'offrir au ouvrier une vie meilleur !”

“Companies shall not control out Populace.”

“We vote to rein them in due to concern for our well being”

“They pose a threat to everyones Privacy.”

“We agree because stronger regulatory oversight and algorithm audits can improve transparency and accountability, while a more business-friendly location may support investment. The projected 1.5% GDP revenue and 6-point technology growth over 24 months could also strengthen public finances and accelerate innovation.”

“Rein them in. No private enterprise or individual should be allowed to dictate to people what they could read or believe! Let them being examined. The one who's not guilty don't fear investigations. If their clean everyone's happy. If their not, law should act.”

“We will imprison these thugs who clearly have no interest in the lives of working people.”

“We support this because it's the much needed solution”

“We support this measure. B. Ug”