Recognise the breakaway state of Port Avalon?

“We support the right of people to choose for themselves, and if they believe themselves to not be a part of Avalon, then we will support them.”

“We are for the independance and new cultures”

“We oppose this secession attempt, Avalon integrity must be defended. It is important for the international community to realize that backing the secession of Port Avalon could create a problematic precedent globally.”

“The creation of a new nation is one of the most significant decisions the world can make politically, and so it must be based on a clear, lawful and democratic process. We believe constitutional issues such as this should be resolved through the rule of law, rather than prematurely going to the international community for recognition, and risking harm to Avalonian people and the nation's economy. We will not be supporting this measure.”

“Port Avalon has proven to be able to uphold it's own economy and governance, so we support their independence.”

“While we do support more action in the realm of decentralizing authority from oblivious bureaucrats, full independence is a much more radical proposal. We can and will support more freedom for the people of Port Avalon, but from within the nation state. Additionally, foreign interference in Avalon domestic affairs is gross misconduct. Who are they to have any say on our nation and its people's destiny?”

“This region is part of Avalon, and will always be.”

“Port Avalon will always be a part of Avalon. Not every part of a country will have the same culture-thats multiculturalism. We furiously call on other countries to stop legitimising this illegitimate breakaway. Port Avalon is never a real country and will always be a part of Avalon.”

“Our country, AZONIA, also had a fight against a oppressive power and struggled for it's independence. Because of this, we are also supporting Port Avalon in its struggle for an independent state. We urge the leaders to work maturely and initiate a independence referendum and negotiate a peaceful, simple and quick transfer of power and statehood to prevent violence. If the referendum says "YES", then AZONIA will happily welcome Port Avalon to the international community, expediting trade negotiations and maybe a state visit.”

“The will of the people in the city of Port Avalon must be respected in our view. Their will cannot be changed, only future possible cooperation between them and their neighbours. It is more important to foster good relations amongst friends than to enforce your will.”

“We should respect freedom wherever we find it”

“no sovereignty, except as granted by Parliament”

“felt like it man. we love the right of the peoples to autodetermine”

“PAS recognizes the independence of Port Avalon because we believe the right of peoples to self-determination is a fundamental democratic principle. If the people of Port Avalon have freely and peacefully expressed their desire to establish an independent state, the international community should respect that choice. We support a peaceful transition based on dialogue, respect for minority rights, and continued economic and diplomatic cooperation between Port Avalon and Avalon. Recognition is not about division—it is about respecting democratic will, stability, and the right of communities to determine their own future.”

“Every nation has an inherent right to self-determination. Port Avalon possesses a distinct culture and a thriving economy capable of standing on its own. Supporting their independence aligns with our core principles of liberty and honoring the clear will of its 3 million citizens.”

“Our party believes in self determination for the peoples of other nations within decent guidelines. Port Avalon is determinedly different in all ways of life then its former ruler nation and so its people should be given a fair chance at independence.”

“Our party supports the power of the people and its right to self-determiantion, to choose their own destiny and how to prospect. The recognition of it's independence follows our principles and therefore we support it”

“As the party which holds government (alongside ALAYON) and the position of Foreign Affairs Minister of Charlemont. We believe that denying them independence would stand against the nationalist values of our party. They deserve independence because there is already a deep cultural and socioeconomic divide between the two sides, and the people of Port Avalon support this movement. The Office of Foreign Affairs for Charlemont pledges our support the state of Port Avalon, but we hope that this doesn’t affect our relations with Avalon, and we can continue trade and cooperation.”

“The State of Charlemont officially recognizes the sovereignty and independence of Port Avalon. Acknowledging the distinct cultural identity, economic self-sufficiency, and the peaceful democratic aspirations of its 3 million citizens, we welcome Port Avalon into the community of nations. We look forward to establishing formal diplomatic relations, fostering robust economic partnerships, and working together to ensure regional stability and prosperity. We urge both Port Avalon and its neighboring states to engage in peaceful dialogue to ensure a smooth transition toward mutual cooperation.”

“I think without understanding the Political relationship between Avalon and Port Avalon we can not aces the situation properly. just because two regions have a difference in economies and culture does not mean they should be separated. That's like saying London should breakaway from the UK . or Texas should breakaway from the US. IT will cause political instability and like we have seen before, Breakaway states bring Instability and decades of war and border disputes.”

“There is little understanding of the political relationship between both parties. A middle ground which is an autonomous region”

“Labour believes it's unecessary for a singular city to break away from a whole country, since it will bring long-term instability and may actually make the conflicts worse”

“I oppose recognizing Port Avalon because economic success and cultural differences alone are not enough to justify breaking apart a nation. Supporting every wealthy region that wants independence could destabilize countries worldwide and undermine respect for existing borders.”

“If the people of Port Avalon want independence, we support them. The people decide their own decisions, not the government.”

“We support freedom Avalon should give independence to port royal”

“Every nation has an inherent right to self-determination. Port Avalon possesses a distinct culture and a thriving economy capable of standing on its own. Supporting their independence aligns with our core principles of liberty and honoring the clear will of its 3 million citizens.”

“we support freedom struggle of this people”

“We believe in self determination and if these people now detirime that they are better off alone we must support them.”

“We support the succession give them independence”

“Self-determination is a great value to uphold”

“A region fundamentally different from the rest of the country must be separated, because otherwise the minority gets suppressed by the majority. We support this independence and hope both governments work together in the future.”

“"Divide et impera" was the Romans' favourite phrase when they sought to weaken an enemy. We will not tolerate the division of a country for the interests of a few; we will never tolerate the fracturing of families or the erosion of freedom between regions. Regions are historical; their homelands are essential.”

“Si no nos pagan no los vamos a reconocemos”

“We will support the recognition of Port Avalon, provided they follow proper procedure and referendum in establishing their independence.”

“Every nation has an inherent right to self-determination. Port Avalon possesses a distinct culture and a thriving economy capable of standing on its own. Supporting their independence aligns with our core principles of liberty and honoring the clear will of its 3 million citizens.”

“Everyone has the right to self-determination. If the citizens of Port Avalon have decided to form their own country, it is only right that we acknowledge and support their effects.”

“Supporting this independence is a reaffirmation of the sacred right to self-determination, the heartbeat of every sovereign nation. The people of Port Avalon have proven they are not mere subjects, but a proud citizenry with a distinct identity and economic might. To deny this independence would be to act as the jailer for an obsolete regime - a role beneath our national dignity. Letting Port Avalon break free is to foster the birth of a dynamic new state, a natural ally that understands liberty is not begged for, but conquered. By recognizing this state, we do not create a dangerous precedent; we celebrate the triumph of national will over bureaucratic inertia. Port Avalon will be a citadel of prosperity and a beacon of true sovereignty. Liberty calls to liberty. Let us stand on the right side of history and support their destiny!”

“We as the National-Conservative Rally recognize the city of Port Avalon as an indipendent country as we support the Woodrow Wilson Doctrine that states that every nation, ethnic group, or distinct population should have the right to determine its own political destiny, govern itself, and choose its own form of government. Instead of being controlled by foreign empires or divided by secret treaties, each territory should belong to its own people, allowing them to form independent nation-states based on their shared identity. GO NATIONAL-CONSERVATIVE!!”

“If it is the people's desire to have an independent nation, they shall decide on that future.”

“Any people fighting for their own freedom deserves their own freedom”

“We believe in all peoples' rights to political self-determination. If Port Avalon's people wish to establish their own nation, then why not let them?”

“The United Left Platform recognizes the independence of Port Avalon because we believe the right of peoples to self-determination is a fundamental democratic principle. If the people of Port Avalon have freely and peacefully expressed their desire to establish an independent state, the international community should respect that choice. We support a peaceful transition based on dialogue, respect for minority rights, and continued economic and diplomatic cooperation between Port Avalon and Avalon. Recognition is not about division—it is about respecting democratic will, stability, and the right of communities to determine their own future.”

“Right to sovereignty is right of people.”

“We would not like to disrupt the international norm of the current possessions of the state of Avalon. Until the regional dispute is finalized by the government of Avalon and it's region we will no disrupt international norm to recognize the break away providence.”

“The recognition of any country that wants independence will destabilize the region and possibly ourselves”

“Well... This is an extremely difficult decision, and its consequences will be significant. However, we must secure our sphere of influence in that area, and trade with Port Avalon would be very attractive. We must be pragmatic. Additionally, as a democratic, rule-of-law state, we should recognize the right of the world's nations to self-determination. Therefore, I propose that we recognize Port Avalon as a sovereign state.”

“If Port Avalon and its residents want independence and express it in a referendum, then we should respect that.”

“If they want they're own country, then let them.”

“We believe in the right of people to determine their own self destiny.”

“We think right to self determination is really important”

“In this situation we have little understanding of the Political relationship between Avalon and Port Avalon we can not aces the situation properly.”

“This should be decided by the people of Port Avalon in a fair and free election monitored by international observers.”

“We cannot support recognition at this stage. Whilst we respect the principle of self-determination, it is not an absolute right under international law as it was primarily developed in the context of decolonisation, not unilateral secession from established democracies: something many politicians often overlook. Strong democracies should seek to accommodate diversity, not fragment until they become weak, divided and hostile towards each other. That said, we would strongly support greater autonomy, federal arrangements and a robust protections for Port Avalon's distinct cultural and economic identity within the existing state.”

“Every people has the right to determine its own future. Where there is a clear and democratic mandate for independence, the international community should not ignore it. Recognition should go hand in hand with dialogue and a commitment to a peaceful transition that protects the rights of everyone affected.”

“If a region's population clearly wants to break away, they should have the right to do so. If they remain in the same state, it will only create dysfunction and increase polarization.”

“Countries and people should be sovereign. A unitary state doesn't benefit anyone. So we stand behind the inhabitants of Port Avalon and their right to sovereignty.”

“We oppose the independence of the port of Avalon as breaking away from the nation is not the only way to safeguard their culture from the rest of Avalon we support the integrity of Avalon”

“The right of nations and peoples to determine their own future should be respected. Recognising Port Avalon’s independence supports self-determination, acknowledges its distinct identity, and strengthens relations with a potentially valuable international partner.”

“We oppose this secession attempt, Avalon integrity must be defended. It is important for the international community to realize that backing the secession of Port Avalon could create a problematic precedent globally. If there are no real cultural or economic differences, there is no need for succession. Independance is given to those subject to tyranny.”

“We believe in self determination but we must prevent this from causing preventable conflict in the region.”

“All people have a right to self-determination; if the people of Port Avalon wish to form their own nation separate from Avalon then the leaders have legitimacy to declare independence, though the Collective stresses an orderly transition to ensure regional stability and for the democratic integrity of Port Avalon's institution to stand firm now they have separated from the institutions of Avalon.”

“If the people of Port Avalon don't feel like a part of Avalon there is no point in not supporting the break away. This will also help prevent further conflicts between the sides”

“Modern Alliance believes that the right to self-determination is an important democratic principle, but it must be balanced with respect for international law, territorial integrity and long-term stability. Recognition of a new state should follow a peaceful, lawful and negotiated process, not unilateral declarations. Premature recognition risks increasing regional tensions and encouraging similar disputes elsewhere. If Port Avalon reaches an internationally recognised agreement with its parent state and demonstrates a stable commitment to democratic governance and the rule of law, we would be prepared to reconsider our position. Until then, we believe diplomacy and dialogue remain the best path forward.”

“We support self determination. As a party of the people, if the people of Port Avalon demands it, we recognizes it. For international solidarity!”

“If Port Avalon and its residents want independence and express it in a referendum, then we should respect that.”

“Every nation has an inherent right to self-determination. Port Avalon possesses a distinct culture and a thriving economy capable of standing on its own. Supporting their independence aligns with our core principles of liberty and honoring the clear will of its 3 million citizens.”

“We believe in the right to self determination”

“we choose to support independence and think that its important”

“We support every people who want to have self determination.”

“We must stay neutral and not intervene in other countries' matters”