Proposed by Union Of New Conservatives · Passed 11 Mar 2021
In these challenging times, we are proposing a budget for national recovery—but above all, for national unity. 1. Tax cuts for the working and middle classes to boost our fellow citizens' purchasing power. 2. Contribution from the wealthiest to the country's recovery. 3. Listening to voters on the environment: fulfilling the promises made to the electorate regarding environmental issues. 4. Funding tax cuts and environmental policies by reducing financial aid to other countries. Let us focus on our fellow citizens and their expectations. In short, a budget designed to unite all our fellow citizens and all the country's political parties. A budget that meets our citizens' expectations and boosts purchasing power. UNITY IS STRENGTH !
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $1,120 | $42.0bn | |
| Retirement | $2,933 | $110.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $2,267 | $85.0bn | |
| Education | $2,000 | $75.0bn | |
| Housing | $1,333 | $50.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $907 | $34.0bn | |
| Defence | $1,067 | $40.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $320 $640 | $12.0bn $24.0bn | |
| Business Support | $507 | $19.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $320 | $12.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $267 $133 | $10.0bn $5.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $429 | $16.1bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $343 | $12.9bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $257 | $9.6bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $171 | $6.4bn | |
| Total | $534.0bn $541.0bn |
For: 396 / 1077 filled seats (36.8%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 410 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 271
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 410 | No | We need a far more ambitious budget in order to satisfy working class needs in this crucial moment. |
| Democratic Liberties | 170 | Yes | This is a good middle ground that helps out working people whilst not punishing the wealthiest too much, a big reduction in foreign aid was long overdue |
| Liberal Alliance | 0 | Not voted | |
| Ludenholm Congress Of Anarchy | 0 | Not voted | |
| Ludenholm Progressive People's Alliance | 290 | Not voted | |
| National Banking Clan | 0 | Not voted | |
| The People's Socialist Front | 394 | Not voted | |
| Union Of New Conservatives Proposer | 226 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 94 / 187 filled seats (50.3%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 60 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 33
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 60 | No | We need a far more ambitious budget in order to satisfy working class needs in this crucial moment. |
| Democratic Liberties | 10 | Yes | This is a good middle ground that helps out working people whilst not punishing the wealthiest too much, a big reduction in foreign aid was long overdue |
| Liberal Alliance | 0 | Not voted | |
| Ludenholm Congress Of Anarchy | 0 | Not voted | |
| Ludenholm Progressive People's Alliance | 39 | Not voted | |
| National Banking Clan | 0 | Not voted | |
| The People's Socialist Front | 43 | Not voted | |
| Union Of New Conservatives Proposer | 84 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is a good middle ground that helps out working people whilst not punishing the wealthiest too much, a big reduction in foreign aid was long overdue”
“We need a far more ambitious budget in order to satisfy working class needs in this crucial moment.”