These changes strengthen secular governance by ending religious privilege, promoting free expression, and ensuring equal public treatment for all beliefs.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blasphemy Law |
No blasphemy law
|
Explicit legal right to criticise religion
|
|
| 2 | Religious Observation Policy |
Permit religion with no state support (neutral tax treatment; no grants)
|
State atheism (religious believers placed in re-education programmes)
|
|
| 3 | Religious Symbols in Public Institutions |
Officials neutral; citizens free
|
Ban religious symbols in public institutions
|
|
| 4 | Shop Trading Hours |
Limited Sunday opening hours
|
Unrestricted trading every day
|
|
| 5 | State-Funded Faith Schools |
Permit existing state-funded faith schools
|
State funds secular schools only
|
Party
The Liberals champions a free and open Zorath — where individuals are trusted to make their own choices, markets are free to innovate, and every culture and belief is welcome under a secular state. We believe prosperity comes from liberty, not control, and that a diverse
Core pillars
Minister of Finance · Age 36
Once a factory worker turned viral social media crusader, Samuel Vaughan became a household name after leading a historic labor strike that forced corporate giants to the negotiating table, blending working-class grit with a firebrand’s unshakable idealism.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 577 / 577 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | No | We do not believe in placing believers in re-education programs |
| Liberal Proposer | 577 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | No | WE DONT AGREE WITH THIS LAW AS A PRO RELIGIOUS PARTY |
| Empty seats | 250 | Not voted |
For: 15 / 15 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | No | We do not believe in placing believers in re-education programs |
| Liberal Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | No | WE DONT AGREE WITH THIS LAW AS A PRO RELIGIOUS PARTY |
For: 348 / 348 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | No | We do not believe in placing believers in re-education programs |
| Liberal Proposer | 348 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | No | WE DONT AGREE WITH THIS LAW AS A PRO RELIGIOUS PARTY |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“WE DONT AGREE WITH THIS LAW AS A PRO RELIGIOUS PARTY”
“We do not believe in placing believers in re-education programs”