Lowering retirement age and protecting workers from automation fosters fairness, reduces unemployment, and prioritizes human dignity over corporate efficiency.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 60
|
Retirement at 55
|
|
| 2 | Automation & the Workforce |
Actively incentivise automation
|
Ban automation that displaces workers; robot levy
|
Party
The Conservative Reform Coalition forges order from chaos defending borders and markets with iron will and steady hand.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 49
The silver-tongued heir to a media empire who parlayed charm and sharp instincts into a political career, mastering the art of spin while cultivating elite allies—yet his ruthless ambition keeps party elders watching him warily.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 577 / 577 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal | 577 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Progressive Alliance Of Socialists And Democrats | 0 | Yes | My party is agree with this |
| The Progressive Bloc | 0 | Yes | We support this package |
| Zorat National Renewal (ZNR) | 0 | Abstain | We agree about the "Ban automation that displaces workers; robot levy" but we still think that the younger generation will pay the price of giving such privileges as the retirement at 55, 65 years could be a good compromise, in the future. Before that we should focus on rejuvenate the country. |
| Empty seats | 250 | Not voted |
For: 11 / 15 seats (73.3%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 4
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal | 4 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Progressive Alliance Of Socialists And Democrats | 2 | Yes | My party is agree with this |
| The Progressive Bloc | 4 | Yes | We support this package |
| Zorat National Renewal (ZNR) | 0 | Abstain | We agree about the "Ban automation that displaces workers; robot levy" but we still think that the younger generation will pay the price of giving such privileges as the retirement at 55, 65 years could be a good compromise, in the future. Before that we should focus on rejuvenate the country. |
For: 348 / 348 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal | 348 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Progressive Alliance Of Socialists And Democrats | 0 | Yes | My party is agree with this |
| The Progressive Bloc | 0 | Yes | We support this package |
| Zorat National Renewal (ZNR) | 0 | Abstain | We agree about the "Ban automation that displaces workers; robot levy" but we still think that the younger generation will pay the price of giving such privileges as the retirement at 55, 65 years could be a good compromise, in the future. Before that we should focus on rejuvenate the country. |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this proposal”
“We support this proposal”
“We agree about the "Ban automation that displaces workers; robot levy" but we still think that the younger generation will pay the price of giving such privileges as the retirement at 55, 65 years could be a good compromise, in the future. Before that we should focus on rejuvenate the country.”
“We support this package”
“My party is agree with this”