Religious Protection Act of 2020
Rationale
These updates modernize laws to balance religious freedom, protest rights, and free speech while strengthening civil liberties and public trust in institutions.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blasphemy Law |
No blasphemy law
|
Limited protection against religious insult
|
|
| 2 | Right to Protest |
Permitted but regulated (noise/disruption limits)
|
Right to protest with prior notice
|
|
| 3 | Religious Observation Policy |
Permit religion with no state support (neutral tax treatment; no grants)
|
Tax-exempt status for registered religious charities
|
|
| 4 | Capital Punishment |
No death penalty
|
Death penalty constitutionally prohibited; extradition refused to countries that use it
|
|
| 5 | Media Censorship Policy |
Targeted regulation (post-publication fines for incitement/defamation; independent regulator)
|
Free press (no prior restraints; narrow limits for direct incitement only)
|
1
Blasphemy Law2
Right to Protest3
Religious Observation Policy4
Capital Punishment5
Media Censorship PolicyProposer
Party
Democrats (D)
The Pragmatic Democratic Socialist party, believes in fiscal responsibility and civil rights.
Core pillars
Marcus Hall
Activist · Age 49
The silver-tongued heir to a media empire who parlayed charm and sharp instincts into a political career, mastering the art of spin while cultivating elite allies—yet his ruthless ambition keeps party elders watching him warily.
Timeline
-
Draft20 April 2020
-
Vote Open28 April 2020
-
Vote Closed28 April 2020
-
Did Not Become Law28 April 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
The People's Synod
FailedFor: 0 / 577 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 577
Supreme Tribunal
FailedFor: 0 / 15 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 15
The Directorate
FailedFor: 0 / 348 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 348
President
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1