Increasing statutory paid leave to 6+ weeks improves worker well-being, boosts productivity, and supports family time—benefiting public health and the economy.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paid Annual Leave |
~4 weeks statutory paid leave
|
6+ weeks statutory paid leave
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 577 / 577 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition | 0 | Yes | This is a good idea to pass |
| Liberal Proposer | 577 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 250 | Not voted |
For: 15 / 15 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition | 0 | Yes | This is a good idea to pass |
| Liberal Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 348 / 348 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition | 0 | Yes | This is a good idea to pass |
| Liberal Proposer | 348 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is a good idea to pass”