Light-touch regulation boosts digital innovation and freedom while targeting only serious crimes, reducing unnecessary burdens on platforms and users.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Internet Freedom |
Moderate regulation (illegal content removed; platforms must verify age; data rules enforced)
|
Light-touch regulation (net neutrality; limited takedown orders for serious crime only)
|
Party
The Homeland Union forges prosperity through faith and free will blending justice with opportunity for all who dare to rise.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 59
A decorated former military officer who transitioned from battlefield leadership to behind-the-scenes political strategy, his sharp understanding of media narratives now shapes the party’s public image despite his well-known struggles with public speaking.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 577 / 577 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | No | We must continue protections on our children, if children are exposed to content that is harmful it could negatively affect their development |
| Liberal | 577 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The Homeland Union Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 250 | Not voted |
For: 15 / 15 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | No | We must continue protections on our children, if children are exposed to content that is harmful it could negatively affect their development |
| Liberal | 15 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The Homeland Union Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 348 / 348 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | No | We must continue protections on our children, if children are exposed to content that is harmful it could negatively affect their development |
| Liberal | 348 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| The Homeland Union Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We must continue protections on our children, if children are exposed to content that is harmful it could negatively affect their development”
“We support this proposal”