Housing Justice And Public Safety Act of 2020
Rationale
These changes address housing shortages, car dependency, unaffordable rents, youth crime risks, and human rights violations by prioritizing urgent public needs over outdated policies.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Balanced planning system
|
Strong national housing targets
|
|
| 2 | Public Transport Policy |
Mixed transport with subsidized public transit
|
Public transport priority (car restrictions in city centres; free transit)
|
|
| 3 | Rent Control |
Light stabilisation, mostly market rents
|
Rent increases capped to inflation
|
|
| 4 | Age of Criminal Responsibility |
From age 12
|
From 16
|
|
| 5 | Capital Punishment |
No death penalty
|
Death penalty constitutionally prohibited; extradition refused to countries that use it
|
1
Housing Supply & Planning2
Public Transport Policy3
Rent Control4
Age of Criminal Responsibility5
Capital PunishmentProposer
Party
Liberal
The Liberals champions a free and open Zorath — where individuals are trusted to make their own choices, markets are free to innovate, and every culture and belief is welcome under a secular state. We believe prosperity comes from liberty, not control, and that a diverse
Core pillars
Nicholas Martin
Minister of Foreign Affairs · Age 39
Raised in a working-class household, Nicholas Martin earned a doctorate while labouring in factories, blending academic rigor with street-smart pragmatism to craft policies that bridge ideological divides without abandoning his principles.
Timeline
-
Draft23 February 2020
-
Vote Open4 May 2020
-
Vote Closed3 July 2020
-
Became Law3 July 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
The People's Synod
PassedFor: 577 / 577 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Proposer | 577 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 250 | Not voted |
Supreme Tribunal
PassedFor: 15 / 15 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
The Directorate
PassedFor: 348 / 348 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Proposer | 348 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
President
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1