“On this we can support”
Family And Justice Modernization Act of 2020
Rationale
These reforms modernize justice and privacy, prioritizing rehabilitation over punishment, protecting children, and safeguarding civil liberties for all citizens.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corporal Punishment |
Corporal punishment banned in justice system and schools
|
Constitutional ban on all physical punishment including by parents at home
|
|
| 2 | Prison & Sentencing Philosophy |
Balanced punishment and rehabilitation
|
Rehabilitation and reintegration focus
|
|
| 3 | Repeat Offender Sentencing |
Judges set sentences case-by-case
|
Reoffending triggers rehabilitation orders
|
|
| 4 | State Surveillance Powers |
Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)
|
Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)
|
|
| 5 | Armed Police |
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
Unarmed except by special authorisation
|
1
Corporal Punishment2
Prison & Sentencing Philosophy3
Repeat Offender Sentencing4
State Surveillance Powers5
Armed PoliceProposer
Party
Liberal
The Liberals champions a free and open Zorath — where individuals are trusted to make their own choices, markets are free to innovate, and every culture and belief is welcome under a secular state. We believe prosperity comes from liberty, not control, and that a diverse
Core pillars
Edith Chapman
Activist · Age 57
Once a child prodigy delivering fiery sermons in provincial halls, Edith Chapman retreated from public life to refine her craft, emerging decades later as a shadow strategist whose razor-sharp speeches can electrify a room or derail opponents before they know what hit them.
Timeline
-
Draft23 February 2020
-
Vote Open27 April 2020
-
Vote Closed26 June 2020
-
Became Law26 June 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
The People's Synod
PassedFor: 577 / 577 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | We will support this |
| Liberal Proposer | 577 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Yes | On this we can support |
| Empty seats | 250 | Not voted |
Supreme Tribunal
PassedFor: 15 / 15 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | We will support this |
| Liberal Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Yes | On this we can support |
The Directorate
PassedFor: 348 / 348 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | We will support this |
| Liberal Proposer | 348 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Yes | On this we can support |
President
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We will support this”