“i guess this is a good bill”
Education And Family Sovereignty Act of 2020
Rationale
These changes ensure equal opportunity, protect children’s rights, and modernize policies while reducing inequality and extremism through uniform education and secular governance.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homeschooling Regulation |
Homeschooling allowed with curriculum standards, testing, and inspections
|
Homeschooling prohibited; all children must attend licensed schools
|
|
| 2 | National Anthem in Schools |
Weekly assembly anthem (participation optional)
|
No anthem in schools (civics taught without ceremonies)
|
|
| 3 | School Selection |
Comprehensive, no selection
|
Comprehensive, mixed-ability classes
|
|
| 4 | Parental Leave Policy |
Shared, non-transferable parental leave (use-it-or-lose-it for each parent)
|
Mandatory one-year leave for both parents; employers may not contact them
|
|
| 5 | Religious Observation Policy |
State atheism (religious believers placed in re-education programmes)
|
Ban organized religion (worship prohibited; institutions dissolved)
|
1
Homeschooling Regulation2
National Anthem in Schools3
School Selection4
Parental Leave Policy5
Religious Observation PolicyProposer
Party
Liberal
The Liberals champions a free and open Zorath — where individuals are trusted to make their own choices, markets are free to innovate, and every culture and belief is welcome under a secular state. We believe prosperity comes from liberty, not control, and that a diverse
Core pillars
Frederick Preston
Prime Minister · Age 36
A former university lecturer turned media strategist, Frederick Preston wields sharp rhetoric and sharp suits to amplify the party’s message, earning a reputation as both a persuasive firebrand and an unshakable loyalist to its leadership.
Timeline
-
Draft2 December 2020
-
Vote Open2 December 2020
-
Vote Closed31 January 2021
-
Became Law31 January 2021
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
The People's Synod
PassedFor: 577 / 577 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition | 0 | Yes | i guess this is a good bill |
| Liberal Proposer | 577 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 250 | Not voted |
Supreme Tribunal
PassedFor: 15 / 15 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition | 0 | Yes | i guess this is a good bill |
| Liberal Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
The Directorate
PassedFor: 348 / 348 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Reform Coalition | 0 | Yes | i guess this is a good bill |
| Liberal Proposer | 348 | Yes | No reason given |
President
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1