“This is more up our lane; this bill ensures privacy protections while including some bipartisan aspects.”
Digital Freedom And Privacy Act of 2020
Rationale
Strengthening privacy, free speech, democratic fairness, and linguistic equity to protect public rights and prevent corporate and state overreach.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Data Privacy & Digital Rights |
Basic data protection (consent required; breach notification; opt-out rights)
|
Ban all personal data collection by private companies
|
|
| 2 | Lobbying & Political Donations |
Disclosure rules, few limits
|
Strict caps and a public lobbying register
|
|
| 3 | Official Language Policy |
Single official language for all official documents and courts
|
Multilingual rights guaranteed (core services available in multiple languages)
|
|
| 4 | Internet Freedom |
Light-touch regulation (net neutrality; limited takedown orders for serious crime only)
|
Completely unregulated internet; no content restrictions of any kind
|
1
Data Privacy & Digital Rights2
Lobbying & Political Donations3
Official Language Policy4
Internet FreedomProposer
Party
Liberal
The Liberals champions a free and open Zorath — where individuals are trusted to make their own choices, markets are free to innovate, and every culture and belief is welcome under a secular state. We believe prosperity comes from liberty, not control, and that a diverse
Core pillars
Henrietta Phillips
Minister of Defense · Age 57
A seasoned political operator with a preacher’s cadence and a fixer’s instincts, Henrietta Phillips rose from local council politics by turning raw charisma and street-smart pragmatism into an unshakable base of loyal supporters.
Timeline
-
Draft23 February 2020
-
Vote Open12 March 2020
-
Vote Closed11 May 2020
-
Became Law11 May 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
The People's Synod
PassedFor: 577 / 577 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | This is more up our lane; this bill ensures privacy protections while including some bipartisan aspects. |
| Liberal Proposer | 577 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Yes | We support these laws and we vote yes. |
| Empty seats | 250 | Not voted |
Supreme Tribunal
PassedFor: 15 / 15 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | This is more up our lane; this bill ensures privacy protections while including some bipartisan aspects. |
| Liberal Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Yes | We support these laws and we vote yes. |
The Directorate
PassedFor: 348 / 348 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats (D) | 0 | Yes | This is more up our lane; this bill ensures privacy protections while including some bipartisan aspects. |
| Liberal Proposer | 348 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Homeland Union | 0 | Yes | We support these laws and we vote yes. |
President
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support these laws and we vote yes.”