Prioritising development will support housing construction, strengthen infrastructure, attract investment and create jobs, while ensuring responsible planning that balances economic growth with environmental considerations.
Prepared by the Ministry of Transport.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Land Conservation & Rewilding |
Balanced land use
|
Prioritise development over protection
|
Party
Modern Alliance of Sveria is a conservative party committed to law and order, free markets, modern infrastructure and supporting working families.
We believe economic growth, personal responsibility and secure communities are the foundation of a stronger Sveria.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 51
Once a radical street performer turned viral campaigner, Blair Carter’s unhinged charm and thunderous speeches have electrified movements for decades, though some whisper their loyalty is as mercurial as their aesthetic.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 149 / 200 seats (74.5%)
Against: 200 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Sveria | 200 | No | We cannot in earnest support this bill when we believe that a balanced approach was the best way for our government to deal with the need to grow our economy whilst maintaining environmental stability. |
| Modern Alliance Of Sveria Proposer | 149 | Yes | No reason given |
| People's Democratic Alliance | 0 | No | While the intention is good, this proposal can have dire consequences on the environment. For that reason, we vote No. |
For: 308 / 700 seats (44.0%)
Against: 412 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Sveria | 412 | No | We cannot in earnest support this bill when we believe that a balanced approach was the best way for our government to deal with the need to grow our economy whilst maintaining environmental stability. |
| Modern Alliance Of Sveria Proposer | 308 | Yes | No reason given |
| People's Democratic Alliance | 0 | No | While the intention is good, this proposal can have dire consequences on the environment. For that reason, we vote No. |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“While the intention is good, this proposal can have dire consequences on the environment. For that reason, we vote No.”
“We cannot in earnest support this bill when we believe that a balanced approach was the best way for our government to deal with the need to grow our economy whilst maintaining environmental stability.”