“We must protect our workers. Unless the NLL can come up with a compromise we have to vote no.”
Labor Standards Reform Bill of 2024
Rationale
These changes modernize labor protections by supporting worker productivity and economic stability through flexible hours and fairer wages.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maximum Working Hours |
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
48-hour weekly maximum
|
|
| 2 | Minimum Wage Policy |
Maximum wage cap (no one may earn more than 10x the lowest-paid worker)
|
High living wage
|
1
Maximum Working Hours2
Minimum Wage PolicyProposer
Party
National Liberty League
The National Liberty League forges a nation where free markets roar and national pride stands unshaken
Core pillars
Rosalind Johnson
Activist · Age 32
A former investment banker turned firebrand reformer, she wields sharp financial acumen like a weapon, blending idealism with ruthless pragmatism to dismantle outdated systems.
Timeline
-
Draft8 September 2024
-
Vote Open8 September 2024
-
Vote Closed7 November 2024
-
Did Not Become Law7 November 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
National Parliament
FailedFor: 0 / 200 seats (0.0%)
Against: 349 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Development | 69 | No | These proposals are directed against hard-working people, which is why we do not support them. |
| National Liberty League Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Sveria Socialists United | 92 | No | The SSU misread the proposal. This bill would actually worsen worker protections so we change our vote to NO |
| Workers Democratic Alliance | 188 | No | We must protect our workers. Unless the NLL can come up with a compromise we have to vote no. |
Union Parliament
FailedFor: 206 / 700 seats (29.4%)
Against: 494 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Development | 122 | No | These proposals are directed against hard-working people, which is why we do not support them. |
| National Liberty League Proposer | 206 | Yes | No reason given |
| Sveria Socialists United | 185 | No | The SSU misread the proposal. This bill would actually worsen worker protections so we change our vote to NO |
| Workers Democratic Alliance | 187 | No | We must protect our workers. Unless the NLL can come up with a compromise we have to vote no. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“These proposals are directed against hard-working people, which is why we do not support them.”
“The SSU misread the proposal. This bill would actually worsen worker protections so we change our vote to NO”
“The SSU supports the additional protection and fairness this provides workers!”