“After further deliberation, the SSU has decided that our opposition towards certain articles are too great for us to simply abstain. As such we change our vote from abstain to against, though we will cooperate with ND if they propose again with certain articles removed”
Education And Family Rights Reform of 2023
Rationale
The package enacts major social reforms: widening adoption eligibility, shifting childcare to income‑based support, making university tuition free, introducing selective secondary schools, and allowing continued state funding for existing religious schools.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adoption & Fostering |
Married couples and single parents
|
Any adult who passes assessment
|
|
| 2 | Childcare Provision |
Universal free childcare
|
Means-tested subsidised childcare
|
|
| 3 | University Tuition |
Tuition fees
|
Free higher education for all
|
|
| 4 | School Selection |
Comprehensive, mixed-ability classes
|
Selective grammar schools by exam
|
|
| 5 | State-Funded Faith Schools |
State funds secular schools only
|
Permit existing state-funded faith schools
|
1
Adoption & Fostering2
Childcare Provision3
University Tuition4
School Selection5
State-Funded Faith SchoolsProposer
Party
National Development
A party of discipline and progress where justice is swift and freedom unshaken. Schools rise walls of wisdom and welfare weaves a safety net of pride.
Core pillars
Malcolm Cunningham
Speaker of the Union Parliament · Age 55
A once-controversial pop star turned political firebrand, Malcolm Cunningham commands stadiums with his fiery speeches while deftly steering media narratives to keep his movement trending—and his critics on the back foot.
Timeline
-
Draft2 November 2023
-
Vote Open24 November 2023
-
Withdrawn15 December 2023
-
Never Became Law15 December 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
National Parliament
FailedFor: 22 / 200 seats (11.0%)
Against: 117 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 61
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Development Proposer | 22 | Yes | No reason given |
| Sveria Centre | 0 | Yes | We strongly endorse free education and we believe that faith schools should have the same resources as a secular one, we will vote yes but would like other solutions to 1, 2 and 5. |
| Sveria Socialists United | 65 | No | After further deliberation, the SSU has decided that our opposition towards certain articles are too great for us to simply abstain. As such we change our vote from abstain to against, though we will cooperate with ND if they propose again with certain articles removed |
| Workers Democratic Alliance | 52 | No | After much debate- we at the SWC have to vote No. While this bill has some good- there is also some things that can be worked on. |
Union Parliament
FailedFor: 122 / 700 seats (17.4%)
Against: 372 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 206
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Development Proposer | 122 | Yes | No reason given |
| Sveria Centre | 0 | Yes | We strongly endorse free education and we believe that faith schools should have the same resources as a secular one, we will vote yes but would like other solutions to 1, 2 and 5. |
| Sveria Socialists United | 185 | No | After further deliberation, the SSU has decided that our opposition towards certain articles are too great for us to simply abstain. As such we change our vote from abstain to against, though we will cooperate with ND if they propose again with certain articles removed |
| Workers Democratic Alliance | 187 | No | After much debate- we at the SWC have to vote No. While this bill has some good- there is also some things that can be worked on. |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“After much debate- we at the SWC have to vote No. While this bill has some good- there is also some things that can be worked on.”
“We strongly endorse free education and we believe that faith schools should have the same resources as a secular one, we will vote yes but would like other solutions to 1, 2 and 5.”
“Whilst the SSU agrees with the adoption policy and tuition fee changes, we disagree with the other three articles. As such the SSU chooses to abstain from voting.”