“We need to spend more.”
Welfare State Budget Proposal
Proposed by Socialists And Democrats · Passed 15 Apr 2024
Rationale
The Welfare State Budget Proposal sets out a new economic direction for Rheinland: lower taxes overall, stronger public services, and a fairer distribution of the tax burden. The proposal reduces taxation for lower-income households, increasing their disposable income and purchasing power, while introducing higher rates for the wealthiest. Despite this more progressive structure, the overall tax burden is reduced across society. At the same time, the budget significantly increases investment in welfare programs, public healthcare, education, and environmental protection. These investments are designed to strengthen essential public services, reduce inequality, protect the environment, and create opportunities for people across Rheinland. The proposal is fully economically sustainable and maintains a broad budget surplus. It demonstrates that strengthening the welfare state does not require abandoning fiscal responsibility: Rheinland can reduce taxes overall while investing more in the services and opportunities that people depend on. This is a budget built around a simple principle: lower taxes, fairer taxation, stronger public services, and prosperity shared more widely.
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
Annual Spending
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $474 $592 | $40.0bn $50.0bn | |
| Retirement | $1,540 | $130.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $1,540 $1,659 | $130.0bn $140.0bn | |
| Education | $1,185 $1,303 | $100.0bn $110.0bn | |
| Housing | $592 | $50.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $711 | $60.0bn | |
| Defence | $2,133 $1,659 | $180.0bn $140.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $12 $225 | $1.0bn $19.0bn | |
| Business Support | $2,251 | $190.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $237 | $20.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $0 $12 | $0.0bn $1.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $339 | $28.6bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $271 | $22.9bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $203 | $17.1bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $135 | $11.4bn | |
| Total | $981.0bn $990.0bn |
Vote tally
Bundesrat
PassedFor: 35 / 67 filled seats (52.2%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 24 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 15 | Yes | We need to spend more. |
| Liberal Union | 13 | No | This increases wasteful spending and attacks our tax cuts, defiantly no |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 9 | Not voted | |
| National People's Front | 2 | Yes | We support these changes |
| Rhineland Social Front | 0 | Yes | Supports equality and stronger public services |
| Socialists And Democrats Proposer | 18 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Christian Democrats | 11 | No | Too much radical change and too much change |
Bundestag
PassedFor: 377 / 650 filled seats (58.0%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 212 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 61
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 107 | Yes | We need to spend more. |
| Liberal Union | 128 | No | This increases wasteful spending and attacks our tax cuts, defiantly no |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy | 109 | Not voted | |
| National People's Front | 21 | Yes | We support these changes |
| Rhineland Social Front | 49 | Yes | Supports equality and stronger public services |
| Socialists And Democrats Proposer | 200 | Yes | No reason given |
| The Christian Democrats | 84 | No | Too much radical change and too much change |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support these changes”
“Supports equality and stronger public services”
“Too much radical change and too much change”
“I'm only voting for SD to support my constitutional amendments”
“This increases wasteful spending and attacks our tax cuts, defiantly no”