Proposed by National League For Freedom And Democracy · Passed 16 Jul 2024
We managed to accumulate a $176.1 billion budget surplus. We should use it effectively. Therefore, we propose this budget. It reduces taxes for all groups while increasing spending on social welfare, security, and entrepreneurship.
Figures show the previous budget where they changed the new value.
| Category | $ per capita | Amount | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Welfare | $592 $770 | $50.0bn $65.0bn | |
| Retirement | $1,540 $1,659 | $130.0bn $140.0bn | |
| Healthcare | $1,659 $1,777 | $140.0bn $150.0bn | |
| Education | $1,303 $1,422 | $110.0bn $120.0bn | |
| Housing | $592 $711 | $50.0bn $60.0bn | |
| Justice, Police & Internal Security | $711 $770 | $60.0bn $65.0bn | |
| Defence | $1,659 $1,777 | $140.0bn $150.0bn | |
| Environment & Climate | $225 | $19.0bn | |
| Business Support | $2,251 $2,310 | $190.0bn $195.0bn | |
| Arts, Culture & Media | $237 | $20.0bn | |
| Foreign Aid | $12 | $1.0bn | |
| Roads & Highways | $339 $360 | $28.6bn $30.4bn | |
| Public Transport & Rail | $271 $288 | $22.9bn $24.3bn | |
| Energy Infrastructure | $203 $216 | $17.1bn $18.2bn | |
| Ports & Airports | $135 $144 | $11.4bn $12.1bn | |
| Total | $990.0bn $1,070.0bn |
For: 41 / 69 filled seats (59.4%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 12 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 5 | Yes | We fully support this budget |
| Liberal Union | 11 | Yes | While the LU does not support bloating the wealth fare state, and would prefer flatter tax cuts, we think overall a decent, bi-partisan budget |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy Proposer | 9 | Yes | No reason given |
| National People's Front | 5 | Yes | A very good pro-development budget |
| Rhineland Social Front | 12 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Socialists And Democrats | 16 | Not voted | |
| The Christian Democrats | 11 | Yes | We vote yes, on this buget. |
For: 388 / 650 filled seats (59.7%) — needs 50.0%
Against: 0 · Abstained: 113 · Not voted: 149
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civic Platform | 53 | Yes | We fully support this budget |
| Liberal Union | 101 | Yes | While the LU does not support bloating the wealth fare state, and would prefer flatter tax cuts, we think overall a decent, bi-partisan budget |
| National League For Freedom And Democracy Proposer | 85 | Yes | No reason given |
| National People's Front | 49 | Yes | A very good pro-development budget |
| Rhineland Social Front | 113 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Socialists And Democrats | 54 | Not voted | |
| The Christian Democrats | 100 | Yes | We vote yes, on this buget. |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We vote yes, on this buget.”
“We fully support this budget”
“A very good pro-development budget”
“While the LU does not support bloating the wealth fare state, and would prefer flatter tax cuts, we think overall a decent, bi-partisan budget”