“The workers of Port Avalon should be the singular priority of the government. We support this legislation, and will work to reform and further its sentiment in government.”
Workers' Protection Act of 2020
Rationale
These changes ensure fair work, secure livelihoods, and dignified care for all, reducing inequality and boosting public wellbeing.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Automation & the Workforce |
Market-led automation
|
Permit automation with strong retraining/transition rights
|
|
| 2 | Maximum Working Hours |
48-hour weekly maximum
|
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
|
| 3 | Minimum Wage Policy |
Basic minimum wage
|
High living wage
|
|
| 4 | Social Care for the Elderly |
Capped lifetime care costs
|
Free universal social care
|
|
| 5 | Childcare Provision |
Means-tested subsidised childcare
|
Universal free childcare
|
1
Automation & the Workforce2
Maximum Working Hours3
Minimum Wage Policy4
Social Care for the Elderly5
Childcare ProvisionProposer
Party
Dockworkers Union
Every ship that enters our harbor, every container unloaded, every business that thrives in Port Avalon depends on working people. We deserve fair pay, safe workplaces, and a real voice in government.
Core pillars
Audrey Campbell
Candidate for Governor of Port Avalon · Age 38
Rising from a childhood of hand-to-mouth struggles, Audrey Campbell wielded media savvy and ruthless pragmatism like a scalpel, carving a path from grassroots organizing to the inner circle of the Dockworkers Union’s leadership.
Timeline
-
Draft1 February 2020
-
Vote Open1 February 2020
-
Vote Closed1 April 2020
-
Became Law1 April 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
City Assembly
PassedFor: 59 / 120 seats (49.2%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 61
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon First | 0 | Yes | The workers of Port Avalon should be the singular priority of the government. We support this legislation, and will work to reform and further its sentiment in government. |
| Conservative Union | 0 | Abstain | While we do not support universal health coverage, we do support strengthening social services |
| Dockworkers Union Proposer | 59 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Democratic Alliance | 0 | Abstain | This much walfare is not good for our country |
Harbor Council
PassedFor: 7 / 15 seats (46.7%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon First | 0 | Yes | The workers of Port Avalon should be the singular priority of the government. We support this legislation, and will work to reform and further its sentiment in government. |
| Conservative Union | 0 | Abstain | While we do not support universal health coverage, we do support strengthening social services |
| Dockworkers Union Proposer | 7 | Yes | No reason given |
| Liberal Democratic Alliance | 0 | Abstain | This much walfare is not good for our country |
| Empty seats | 7 | Not voted |
Governor of Port Avalon
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This much walfare is not good for our country”
“While we do not support universal health coverage, we do support strengthening social services”
“We do not believe in universal health coverage”
“We support this proposal”