This legislation will create increased access to welfare while giving incentive to work. It also frees our youth from the obligation of military service to focus more on education and the job market, while retaining volunteers willing to serve, and separating the wheat from the chaff.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welfare Conditionality |
Strict time limits on benefits
|
Mandatory work-for-benefits
|
|
| 2 | Military Service Policy |
National service for those 18-20
|
Volunteer professional army
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 22 / 120 seats (18.3%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 70 · Not voted: 28
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalonian Foundations | 70 | Abstain | While our party supports a volunteer professional military, we cannot support a broadening of the welfare system. |
| Common Sense Proposer | 9 | Yes | No reason given |
| Dockworkers Union | 13 | Yes | This is a good change! |
For: 4 / 15 seats (26.7%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 7 · Not voted: 4
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalonian Foundations | 7 | Abstain | While our party supports a volunteer professional military, we cannot support a broadening of the welfare system. |
| Common Sense Proposer | 2 | Yes | No reason given |
| Dockworkers Union | 2 | Yes | This is a good change! |
| Empty seats | 7 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is a good change!”
“While our party supports a volunteer professional military, we cannot support a broadening of the welfare system.”