Tighten asylum and immigration rules to reduce strain on public resources and ensure newcomers contribute meaningfully while protecting national security.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asylum & Refugees |
Generous resettlement and support
|
Strict processing, limited support
|
|
| 2 | Integration Requirements |
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Strong protections against removal
|
Firm enforcement with appeals
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 120 seats (0.0%)
Against: 120 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon First Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Conservative Union | 0 | No | We rely on immigration and meeting international obligations |
| Dockworkers Union | 59 | No | As a City State Port Avalon relies on Immigration |
| Liberal Democratic Alliance | 61 | No | We don't support this proposal port Avalon is the land of immigration |
For: 0 / 15 seats (0.0%)
Against: 15 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon First Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Conservative Union | 0 | No | We rely on immigration and meeting international obligations |
| Dockworkers Union | 7 | No | As a City State Port Avalon relies on Immigration |
| Liberal Democratic Alliance | 8 | No | We don't support this proposal port Avalon is the land of immigration |
| Empty seats | 7 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Union | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We rely on immigration and meeting international obligations”
“As a City State Port Avalon relies on Immigration”
“We don't support this proposal port Avalon is the land of immigration”