Lowering retirement age to 60 supports aging workers’ health and boosts youth employment opportunities for economic fairness and stability.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Retirement Age Policy |
Retirement at 70
|
Retirement at 60
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 73 / 120 seats (60.8%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 47
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon First | 34 | Yes | Our older citizens work their entire lives, and do not deserve to have to work until the old age of 70. We support the Civic Democratic Coalition’s measure. |
| Avalonian Foundations | 24 | Yes | 60 appears to be a reasonable retirement age, given the nature of our workforce, currently. |
| Civic Democratic Coalition Proposer | 15 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 9 / 15 seats (60.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 6
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avalon First | 4 | Yes | Our older citizens work their entire lives, and do not deserve to have to work until the old age of 70. We support the Civic Democratic Coalition’s measure. |
| Avalonian Foundations | 3 | Yes | 60 appears to be a reasonable retirement age, given the nature of our workforce, currently. |
| Civic Democratic Coalition Proposer | 2 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 7 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“60 appears to be a reasonable retirement age, given the nature of our workforce, currently.”
“Our older citizens work their entire lives, and do not deserve to have to work until the old age of 70. We support the Civic Democratic Coalition’s measure.”