“This is a good start to emboldening the economy and making sure our children have the career resources needed to succeed. While AF supports this bill in theory, we would like to see additional changes made to counteract any potential downsides.”
Child Labour Reform Act of 2023
Rationale
These changes recognize teens' need for early work experience while maintaining protections, promoting skill development and financial literacy for youth.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Child Labour Law |
Employment permitted from age 16 with restrictions; no work under 16
|
Light work permitted from age 14; full employment from 16
|
1
Child Labour LawProposer
Party
The Sovereign Coalition
A party of unshaken tradition and relentless strength where duty carves the path and sovereignty is non-negotiable.
Core pillars
Christopher Taylor
Activist · Age 46
A former high-ranking banker who swapped Wall Street for Westminster, where his sharp financial mind now shapes the party’s economic vision and enforces fiscal discipline.
Timeline
-
Draft12 December 2023
-
Vote Open12 December 2023
-
Withdrawn1 January 2024
-
Never Became Law1 January 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
City Assembly
FailedFor: 0 / 120 seats (0.0%)
Against: 21 · Abstained: 70 · Not voted: 29
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For The Left (AFL) | 21 | No | The AFL opposes lowering the minimum working age to 14 because young people should be protected from exploitation and excessive pressure at an early age. While gaining work experience is valuable, teenagers should have enough time for education, rest, family, and personal development. Allowing employment from 14 could put pressure on some young people to work because of financial difficulties and could create opportunities for employers to take advantage of younger workers. Instead, we support supervised work-experience programs, stronger financial-literacy education, and opportunities that help teenagers develop practical skills without weakening protections for young workers. Keeping the minimum employment age at 16 provides a better balance between youth development and access to employment. |
| Avalonian Foundations | 70 | Abstain | This is a good start to emboldening the economy and making sure our children have the career resources needed to succeed. While AF supports this bill in theory, we would like to see additional changes made to counteract any potential downsides. |
| Sovereign Homeland Prosperity | 0 | No | The SPP cannot tolerate this proposal, as it violates international laws against child exploitation. |
| The Sovereign Coalition Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
Harbor Council
FailedFor: 0 / 15 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 7 · Not voted: 8
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative For The Left (AFL) | 0 | No | The AFL opposes lowering the minimum working age to 14 because young people should be protected from exploitation and excessive pressure at an early age. While gaining work experience is valuable, teenagers should have enough time for education, rest, family, and personal development. Allowing employment from 14 could put pressure on some young people to work because of financial difficulties and could create opportunities for employers to take advantage of younger workers. Instead, we support supervised work-experience programs, stronger financial-literacy education, and opportunities that help teenagers develop practical skills without weakening protections for young workers. Keeping the minimum employment age at 16 provides a better balance between youth development and access to employment. |
| Avalonian Foundations | 7 | Abstain | This is a good start to emboldening the economy and making sure our children have the career resources needed to succeed. While AF supports this bill in theory, we would like to see additional changes made to counteract any potential downsides. |
| Sovereign Homeland Prosperity | 0 | No | The SPP cannot tolerate this proposal, as it violates international laws against child exploitation. |
| The Sovereign Coalition Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 7 | Not voted |
Governor of Port Avalon
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is a good start to emboldening the economy and making sure our children have the career resources needed to succeed.”
“The AFL opposes lowering the minimum working age to 14 because young people should be protected from exploitation and excessive pressure at an early age. While gaining work experience is valuable, teenagers should have enough time for education, rest, family, and personal development. Allowing employment from 14 could put pressure on some young people to work because of financial difficulties and could create opportunities for employers to take advantage of younger workers. Instead, we support supervised work-experience programs, stronger financial-literacy education, and opportunities that help teenagers develop practical skills without weakening protections for young workers. Keeping the minimum employment age at 16 provides a better balance between youth development and access to employment.”
“The SPP cannot tolerate this proposal, as it violates international laws against child exploitation.”