Nationalising key utilities and transport ensures reliable, affordable services for all, reducing corporate profiteering, founds a way for mass employment and also prioritising public welfare over private gains.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Nationalise all key utilities and transport
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 100 seats (0.0%)
Against: 36 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 64
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Historic Pact Of Novograd | 0 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Progessive Reform | 36 | No | If you want growth you stay privatized, if you want stability you nationalize. This nation is solid enough as it is, this is the wrong solution to a big problem. Maybe something else to reduce unemployment would work but for me this a no. |
| The Revolutionary Communist Union Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We support this proposal”
“If you want growth you stay privatized, if you want stability you nationalize. This nation is solid enough as it is, this is the wrong solution to a big problem. Maybe something else to reduce unemployment would work but for me this a no.”