“We support this proposal”
AI Safety And Accountability Act of 2020
Rationale
Strict licensing and audits ensure AI safety amid rapid, unchecked development that risks public harm without accountability.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI Development & Safety |
Balanced oversight
|
Strict licensing, safety audits, liability
|
1
AI Development & SafetyProposer
Party
The Great Improvement
We stand guard over progress with unshakable strength and an open hand to those who build.
Core pillars
Nathaniel Blake
Activist · Age 47
Born into old money but armed with a cold calculator, Nathaniel Blake burned through his trust fund funding think tanks before turning his ruthless pragmatism toward power, earning a reputation for cutting deals with surgical precision.
Timeline
-
Draft30 May 2020
-
Vote Open30 May 2020
-
Vote Closed29 July 2020
-
Became Law29 July 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Worker's Congress
PassedFor: 96 / 100 seats (96.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 4
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Front | 35 | Yes | We support this proposal |
| Marxist Leninist Front | 33 | Yes | Let's make it now!!! |
| The Great Improvement Proposer | 28 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Let's make it now!!!”