“We voted NO on this constitutional reform. Not out of opposition to the principles mentioned, but in rejection of a unilateral and undemocratic method. The NRF and the other parties were neither involved nor consulted in drafting these fundamental amendments. Reforming the Constitution requires a national consensus and thorough consultation among all political forces, not a diktat secretly drafted by a single group. A fundamental law cannot be built without respecting pluralism. Demanding co-creation is not a whim, it is an essential democratic guarantee!”
Constitutional reform from The Marianne Liberty Alliance of April 2021
Proposed by The Marianne Liberty Alliance in Marianne
Senate: 17.0% / 67% of all seats
National Assembly: 32.4% / 67% of all seats
Package Overview (4 measures)
FailedCreated: April 16, 2021
Opened: April 17, 2021
Closed: April 20, 2021
Opening this package cost 120 PP.
What would change
Full constitution with changes markedCurrent wording is shown as it was when voting began.
Powers
Head of the Police
Head of the Police moves from Minister of the Interior to Professional non-partisan bureaucrats
Minister of the Interior
Professional non-partisan bureaucrats
Amendments
Amendments
Add an amendment: “There shall be equal rights under the law, regardless of status, race, religi…”
There shall be equal rights under the law, regardless of status, race, religion, creed, origin, sex, et cetera.
Amendments
Add an amendment: “Those charged under crimes in Marianne have the right to speedy trial and a l…”
Those charged under crimes in Marianne have the right to speedy trial and a lawyer and a protection against profiling, unreasonable search and seizure, excessive bail, excessive fines, forced labor, and cruel and unusual punishments.
Amendments
Add an amendment: “The freedom of speech, press, assembly, religious exercise, and from religiou…”
The freedom of speech, press, assembly, religious exercise, and from religious establishment shall not be infringed. Religious exercise and establishment meaning both for a faith, for multiple faiths, and for a lack of thereof.
Proposer's case
To remove risk of abuse of power, while at the same time adding more explicit guarantees to rights of held within Marianne.
Vote tally
Senate
Failed
59Yes
135No
154Not voted
348 seats
For: 59 / 348 seats (17.0%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 135 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 154
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 0 | Yes | We support this constitutional reform |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance Proposer | 59 | Yes | No reason given |
| The National Refoundation Front | 135 | No | We voted NO on this constitutional reform. Not out of opposition to the principles mentioned, but in rejection of a unilateral and undemocratic method. The NRF and the other parties were neither involved nor consulted in drafting these fundamental amendments. Reforming the Constitution requires a national consensus and thorough consultation among all political forces, not a diktat secretly drafted by a single group. A fundamental law cannot be built without respecting pluralism. Demanding co-creation is not a whim, it is an essential democratic guarantee! |
National Assembly
Failed
187Yes
227No
163Not voted
577 seats
For: 187 / 577 seats (32.4%) — needs 66.6%
Against: 227 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 163
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Left | 51 | Yes | We support this constitutional reform |
| The Marianne Liberty Alliance Proposer | 136 | Yes | No reason given |
| The National Refoundation Front | 227 | No | We voted NO on this constitutional reform. Not out of opposition to the principles mentioned, but in rejection of a unilateral and undemocratic method. The NRF and the other parties were neither involved nor consulted in drafting these fundamental amendments. Reforming the Constitution requires a national consensus and thorough consultation among all political forces, not a diktat secretly drafted by a single group. A fundamental law cannot be built without respecting pluralism. Demanding co-creation is not a whim, it is an essential democratic guarantee! |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
The National Refoundation Front
Voted April 19, 2021
No
The Left
Voted April 17, 2021
Yes
“We support this constitutional reform”