Unconditional benefits reduce poverty and administrative costs while improving wellbeing and workforce participation.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welfare Conditionality |
Mandatory work-for-benefits
|
Unconditional benefits
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 28 / 150 seats (18.7%)
Against: 122 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frons Munita | 83 | No | Creating a freeloading state is not in our future plans. |
| Junta Militar De G. Boné Proposer | 28 | Yes | No reason given |
| Optimates Fasces | 39 | No | This would cost an outrageous amount of money that we cannot guarantee. |
For: 69 / 350 seats (19.7%)
Against: 281 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frons Munita | 167 | No | Creating a freeloading state is not in our future plans. |
| Junta Militar De G. Boné Proposer | 69 | Yes | No reason given |
| Optimates Fasces | 114 | No | This would cost an outrageous amount of money that we cannot guarantee. |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel Blanco | 1 | No | No reason given |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Vázquez | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This would cost an outrageous amount of money that we cannot guarantee.”
“Creating a freeloading state is not in our future plans.”