“We support this legislation.”
Strengthening Domestic Economy Act of 2024
Royal veto exercised
Rationale
These changes strengthen domestic resilience, protect workers and small businesses, and ensure fairness in a rapidly changing economy.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agricultural Market Regime |
Mixed regime: tariffs on some staples, intervention only in a crisis
|
Import quotas and price floors protect domestic farmers
|
|
| 2 | Workplace Safety |
Statutory safety standards enforced by a labour inspectorate
|
Strict standards, frequent unannounced inspections, heavy fines
|
|
| 3 | Retail Planning & Licensing |
Planning permission required for large stores; otherwise open
|
Out-of-town and large-format stores restricted to protect independents
|
|
| 4 | Online Retail & Marketplaces |
Marketplaces liable for illegal or unsafe third-party goods; standard returns rights
|
Limited platform liability; minimal checks on small cross-border parcels
|
|
| 5 | Severance & Redundancy Pay |
Statutory severance for long-serving staff
|
Generous severance scaled to years of service, plus a mandatory retraining offer
|
1
Agricultural Market Regime2
Workplace Safety3
Retail Planning & Licensing4
Online Retail & Marketplaces5
Severance & Redundancy PayProposer
Party
Optimates Fasces
The Optimates Fasci forge a future of unshaken order and enduring strength where culture thrives under firm leadership.
Core pillars
Ramón Torres
Iustitiae et iurisdictionis Legatus · Age 53
Ramón Torres abandoned a lucrative career in finance to champion his ideals, wielding both academic rigor and sharp intellect to craft policies while quietly pulling strings in political and business circles.
Timeline
-
Draft26 July 2024
-
Vote Open26 July 2024
-
Vote Closed24 September 2024
-
Did Not Become Law24 September 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senatus iuris
PassedFor: 150 / 150 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frons Munita | 83 | Yes | We support this legislation. |
| Junta Militar De G. Boné | 28 | Yes | I access to that reform |
| Optimates Fasces Proposer | 39 | Yes | No reason given |
Curia plebiscitaria
PassedFor: 350 / 350 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frons Munita | 167 | Yes | We support this legislation. |
| Junta Militar De G. Boné | 69 | Yes | I access to that reform |
| Optimates Fasces Proposer | 114 | Yes | No reason given |
Consul Regis
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel Blanco Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Plebis Tribunus
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Vázquez Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“I access to that reform”