Ludenholm
Proposals
Limited Strike Rights Act of …

Legislative Bill · Ludenholm

Limited Strike Rights Act of 2016

Proposed by The Reformist Alliance · fronted by Edmund Vaughan

Opened

6 Aug 2016

Voting closes

5 Oct 2016

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

1 change

Rationale

Strikes disrupt vital services; limited strikes protect public welfare while ensuring union representation.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Trade Union Rights	Full collective bargaining and strike rights		Unions permitted but strikes severely limited (cooling-off periods; binding arbitration)

1

Trade Union Rights

Previous law

Full collective bargaining and strike rights

Unions permitted but strikes severely limited (cooling-off periods; binding arbitration)

Proposer

Party

The Reformist Alliance

The Reformist Alliance forges ahead with the power of free minds and open doors. Prosperity flows where liberty leads.

Core pillars

Edmund Vaughan

Activist · Age 58

28,806 social followers

A decade-long advisor to reformist lawmakers, Edmund Vaughan’s sharp intellect and knack for building coalitions have made him a behind-the-scenes architect of policy shifts—though his idealism often clashes with the party’s more pragmatic factions.

🔬 Analytical ✨ Charismatic 🌟 Idealist 🏙️ Street Smart 🔗 Well Connected

Timeline

Draft

6 August 2016
Vote Open

6 August 2016
Vote Closed

5 October 2016
Did Not Become Law

5 October 2016

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Statenhaus

Failed

80Yes 106No 1Not voted 187 seats

For: 80 / 187 seats (42.8%)

Against: 106 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 43.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Communist Movement	16	No	No reason given
Green Liberals	71	No	No reason given
Ludenholm Progressive People's Alliance	19	No	No reason given
The Reformist Alliance Proposer	80	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	43	Not voted

Riksdag

Failed

442Yes 625No 10Not voted 1077 seats

For: 442 / 1077 seats (41.0%)

Against: 625 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 10

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 41.4%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Communist Movement	118	No	No reason given
Green Liberals	353	No	No reason given
Ludenholm Progressive People's Alliance	154	No	No reason given
The Reformist Alliance Proposer	442	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	13	Not voted

President

Passed

1Yes 0No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)

Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
The Reformist Alliance Proposer	1	Yes	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.