Ludenholm
Proposals
Targeted State Surveillance Act of …

Legislative Bill · Ludenholm

Targeted State Surveillance Act of 2019

Proposed by Conservatives · fronted by Ethan Evans

Opened

17 Jun 2019

Voting closes

16 Aug 2019

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

1 change

Rationale

Balancing national security with privacy requires targeted surveillance to combat serious crime while maintaining public trust through judicial oversight and transparency.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	State Surveillance Powers	Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)		Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)

1

State Surveillance Powers

Previous law

Strict privacy protections (right to encryption; no bulk data collection; facial recognition banned)

Targeted surveillance (court order required; independent oversight commissioner)

Proposer

Party

Conservatives

The hammer of progress strikes hard where roads meet rail and law meets action for those who build and those who inherit

Core pillars

Ethan Evans

Activist · Age 35

10,264 social followers

A former military strategist who transitioned into policy work, Ethan Evans combines razor-sharp analysis with an unyielding moral compass, earning a reputation as the party’s rising star while drawing admiration—and occasional resentment—for his relentless ambition.

🎓 Academic 🚀 Ambitious 🔬 Analytical 🎖️ Former Military 🛡️ Incorruptible

Timeline

Draft

14 June 2019
Vote Open

17 June 2019
Vote Closed

16 August 2019
Did Not Become Law

16 August 2019

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Statenhaus

Failed

44Yes 143No 0Not voted 187 seats

For: 44 / 187 seats (23.5%)

Against: 143 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 23.5%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Communist Movement	63	No	No reason given
Conservatives Proposer	22	Yes	No reason given
The Reformist Alliance	80	No	No reason given
Union Of New Conservatives	22	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	43	Not voted

Riksdag

Failed

302Yes 775No 0Not voted 1077 seats

For: 302 / 1077 seats (28.0%)

Against: 775 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 28.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Communist Movement	322	No	No reason given
Conservatives Proposer	143	Yes	No reason given
The Reformist Alliance	453	No	No reason given
Union Of New Conservatives	159	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	13	Not voted

President

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
The Reformist Alliance	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.