Legislative Bill · Ludenholm

Rearmament plan of 2018

Proposed by Union Of New Conservatives · fronted by Rupert Hawkins

Opened

15 Nov 2018

Voting closes

14 Jan 2019

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

1 change

Rationale

Expanding the nuclear arsenal enhances national security by deterring emerging global threats and ensuring strategic stability in an uncertain geopolitical landscape. We must be able to confront dangerous new countries. We must protect our sovereignty.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Nuclear Weapons	Maintain a minimal deterrent		Expand the nuclear arsenal

1

Nuclear Weapons

Previous law

Maintain a minimal deterrent

Expand the nuclear arsenal

Proposer

Party

Union Of New Conservatives

The Union of New Conservatives stands as the unyielding shield of tradition and the architect of a resurgent identity where order commands the tide.

Core pillars

Rupert Hawkins

Activist · Age 57

120,004 social followers

A former military strategist turned political provocateur, Rupert Hawkins brought battlefield discipline to the stump, using his outsider’s perspective and unapologetic confrontational style to rally disillusioned veterans and working-class communities alike.

🎖️ Former Military 🌍 Outsider ⚖️ Pragmatist 🔥 Firebrand

Timeline

Draft

15 November 2018
Vote Open

15 November 2018
Vote Closed

14 January 2019
Did Not Become Law

14 January 2019

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Statenhaus

Failed

0Yes 162No 25Not voted 187 seats

For: 0 / 187 seats (0.0%)

Against: 162 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 25

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 0.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Communist Movement	48	No	No reason given
Conservatives	41	No	No reason given
The Reformist Alliance	73	No	No reason given
Union Of New Conservatives Proposer	0	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	43	Not voted

Riksdag

Failed

0Yes 934No 143Not voted 1077 seats

For: 0 / 1077 seats (0.0%)

Against: 934 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 143

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 0.0%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Communist Movement	277	No	No reason given
Conservatives	238	No	No reason given
The Reformist Alliance	419	No	No reason given
Union Of New Conservatives Proposer	0	Yes	No reason given
Empty seats	13	Not voted

President

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
The Reformist Alliance	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

No votes cast yet.