Strengthening integration, public cohesion, and national identity through clear language requirements, controlled immigration, and fair but rigorous citizenship rules.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Integration Requirements |
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
|
| 2 | Immigration Quota Policy |
No quotas, open immigration
|
Severely limited immigration
|
|
| 3 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth on national soil and naturalisation after 5 years' residency
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 41 / 187 seats (21.9%)
Against: 62 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 84
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 43 | No | .................... |
| Ludenholm Congress Of Anarchy | 0 | No | Borders are imaginary lines, why should we abide by them |
| Ludenholm National People's Union | 12 | Yes | We approve................. |
| National Banking Clan | 19 | No | This will completely ruin our economy and be bad for the people |
| The People's Socialist Front Proposer | 29 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 43 | Not voted |
For: 394 / 1077 seats (36.6%)
Against: 370 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 313
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 302 | No | .................... |
| Ludenholm Congress Of Anarchy | 0 | No | Borders are imaginary lines, why should we abide by them |
| Ludenholm National People's Union | 193 | Yes | We approve................. |
| National Banking Clan | 68 | No | This will completely ruin our economy and be bad for the people |
| The People's Socialist Front Proposer | 201 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 13 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This will completely ruin our economy and be bad for the people”
“....................”
“We approve.................”
“Borders are imaginary lines, why should we abide by them”