“....................”
National Biometric Identification Act of 2020
Rationale
Strengthens national security and reduces fraud by ensuring accurate biometric identification and a secure central registry for all citizens.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Identity Cards |
Mandatory ID card
|
Mandatory biometric ID + central register
|
1
National Identity CardsProposer
Party
Union Of New Conservatives
The Union of New Conservatives stands as the unyielding shield of tradition and the architect of a resurgent identity where order commands the tide.
Core pillars
Rupert Hawkins
Activist · Age 57
A former military strategist turned political provocateur, Rupert Hawkins brought battlefield discipline to the stump, using his outsider’s perspective and unapologetic confrontational style to rally disillusioned veterans and working-class communities alike.
Timeline
-
Draft5 February 2020
-
Vote Open5 February 2020
-
Vote Closed5 April 2020
-
Did Not Become Law5 April 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Statenhaus
FailedFor: 65 / 187 seats (34.8%)
Against: 100 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 22
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 37 | No | .................... |
| Conservatives | 20 | Yes | we have been trying to pass this bill since the past 1 year. |
| Democratic Liberties | 10 | Yes | This is central to protecting citizens and our borders |
| The Reformist Alliance | 63 | No | We should not centralize the data as it makes us more vulnerable to a targeted breach |
| Union Of New Conservatives Proposer | 35 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 43 | Not voted |
Riksdag
FailedFor: 302 / 1077 seats (28.0%)
Against: 775 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 322 | No | .................... |
| Conservatives | 143 | Yes | we have been trying to pass this bill since the past 1 year. |
| Democratic Liberties | 0 | Yes | This is central to protecting citizens and our borders |
| The Reformist Alliance | 453 | No | We should not centralize the data as it makes us more vulnerable to a targeted breach |
| Union Of New Conservatives Proposer | 159 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 13 | Not voted |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Reformist Alliance | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We should not centralize the data as it makes us more vulnerable to a targeted breach”
“we have been trying to pass this bill since the past 1 year.”
“This is central to protecting citizens and our borders”