Shifts from an impractical ban to pragmatic energy security, ensuring reliable supply and economic stability for households and businesses.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fossil Fuel Extraction |
Ban all new extraction
|
Maximise domestic extraction
|
Party
The Democratic Liberties Party forges a nation of unshaken strength where ambition meets tradition and borders stand unbroken.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 54
A self-made economist who clawed his way from factory floors to faculty halls, he pairs razor-sharp policy proposals with a fiery oratory style, making him both feared and favored by the political class.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 65 / 187 seats (34.8%)
Against: 28 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 94
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 28 | No | .................... |
| Democratic Liberties Proposer | 20 | Yes | No reason given |
| Union Of New Conservatives | 45 | Yes | We must be able to maintain energy independence! Yes, we need to keep renewable energy sources, but we must also consider the national interest. |
| Empty seats | 43 | Not voted |
For: 396 / 1077 seats (36.8%)
Against: 410 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 271
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 410 | No | .................... |
| Democratic Liberties Proposer | 170 | Yes | No reason given |
| Union Of New Conservatives | 226 | Yes | We must be able to maintain energy independence! Yes, we need to keep renewable energy sources, but we must also consider the national interest. |
| Empty seats | 13 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We must be able to maintain energy independence! Yes, we need to keep renewable energy sources, but we must also consider the national interest.”
“....................”