“We need to protect privacy”
AI Surveillance Regulation Act of 2020
Rationale
Balancing public safety with privacy rights, regulated AI surveillance enables targeted crime prevention while preventing overreach and misuse.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI Surveillance & Predictive Policing |
Ban AI surveillance & facial recognition
|
Regulated, warrant-based, targeted use
|
1
AI Surveillance & Predictive PolicingProposer
Party
Union Of New Conservatives
The Union of New Conservatives stands as the unyielding shield of tradition and the architect of a resurgent identity where order commands the tide.
Core pillars
Rupert Crawford
Activist · Age 34
A former think tank prodigy who abandoned academia for the trenches, Rupert Crawford mastered the art of persuasion while cultivating a reputation for the decisive action others hesitate to take.
Timeline
-
Draft22 March 2020
-
Vote Open22 March 2020
-
Vote Closed21 May 2020
-
Did Not Become Law21 May 2020
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Statenhaus
FailedFor: 45 / 187 seats (24.1%)
Against: 100 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 42
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 37 | No | .................... |
| Conservatives | 0 | Yes | Law and order supremacy |
| Democratic Liberties | 10 | Yes | Needed for public safety |
| The Reformist Alliance | 63 | No | We need to protect privacy |
| Union Of New Conservatives Proposer | 35 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 43 | Not voted |
Riksdag
FailedFor: 159 / 1077 seats (14.8%)
Against: 775 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 143
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communist Movement | 322 | No | .................... |
| Conservatives | 0 | Yes | Law and order supremacy |
| Democratic Liberties | 0 | Yes | Needed for public safety |
| The Reformist Alliance | 453 | No | We need to protect privacy |
| Union Of New Conservatives Proposer | 159 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 13 | Not voted |
President
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Reformist Alliance | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“....................”
“Needed for public safety”
“Law and order supremacy”