Lavaria
Proposals
Total Prohibition on Tobacco and …

Legislative Bill · Lavaria

Total Prohibition on Tobacco and Alcohol of 2023

Proposed by Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire · fronted by Duncan Morris

Opened

9 Sep 2023

Voting closes

8 Nov 2023

Chambers

2 legislatures

Articles

2 changes

Rationale

Ces mesures visent à protéger la santé publique en éliminant les risques liés au tabac et à l'alcool, principales causes de maladies évitables.

Proposed Changes

	Law	Previous		Proposed
1	Tobacco & Vaping Regulation	Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)		Total ban on tobacco and vaping products; possession criminalized
2	Alcohol Regulation	Strict regulation (age 21; high excise; retail 10:00–20:00; public drinking banned)		Total prohibition (production and sale banned; medical/religious exemptions only)

1

Tobacco & Vaping Regulation

Previous law

Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)

Total ban on tobacco and vaping products; possession criminalized

2

Alcohol Regulation

Previous law

Strict regulation (age 21; high excise; retail 10:00–20:00; public drinking banned)

Total prohibition (production and sale banned; medical/religious exemptions only)

Proposer

Party

Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire

le PCR est un parti communiste révolutionnaire qui protège les travailleur et les personne pauvre nous souhaitons partager les richesse entre les pauvre et les riche

Core pillars

Duncan Morris

Candidate for President · Age 56

10,807 social followers

A reclusive data analyst who once crunched numbers for a think tank, Duncan Morris vanished into the shadows to quietly dismantle corrupt systems—until his uncanny ability to predict political shifts made him a power broker no one saw coming.

🔬 Analytical 🎭 Eccentric 🌍 Outsider ⚖️ Pragmatist 🏠 Reclusive

Timeline

Draft

9 September 2023
Vote Open

9 September 2023
Vote Closed

8 November 2023
Did Not Become Law

8 November 2023

Vote tally

Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.

Proletarian Assembly

Failed

129Yes 267No 124Not voted 520 seats

For: 129 / 520 seats (24.8%)

Against: 267 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 124

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 32.6%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Center-Left Coalition	113	No	As long as it does not harm the public, personal hobbies should not be subject to regulation. Excessive regulation will only fuel public discontent.
Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire Proposer	129	Yes	No reason given
Structural Centrist Academic Conference	154	No	Any ban creates a negative connotation, which, in turn, gives product oppositional character and weight. In this case, we believe that this is too high a price, not including the administrative costs of effective control.

Union Assembly

Failed

10Yes 25No 15Not voted 50 seats

For: 10 / 50 seats (20.0%)

Against: 25 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 15

50.1% of those voting must vote in favour (actual = 28.6%)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Center-Left Coalition	16	No	As long as it does not harm the public, personal hobbies should not be subject to regulation. Excessive regulation will only fuel public discontent.
Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire Proposer	10	Yes	No reason given
Structural Centrist Academic Conference	9	No	Any ban creates a negative connotation, which, in turn, gives product oppositional character and weight. In this case, we believe that this is too high a price, not including the administrative costs of effective control.

President

Failed

0Yes 1No 0Not voted 1 seat

For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)

Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0

Passes unless the office holder votes against (abstention counts as pass)

Party	Seats	Vote	Reason
Structural Centrist Academic Conference	1	No	No reason given

Voting record

Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.

Structural Centrist Academic Conference

Voted Oct. 1, 2023

“Any ban creates a negative connotation, which, in turn, gives product oppositional character and weight. In this case, we believe that this is too high a price, not including the administrative costs of effective control.”

Center-Left Coalition

Voted Sept. 10, 2023

“As long as it does not harm the public, personal hobbies should not be subject to regulation. Excessive regulation will only fuel public discontent.”