Population needs more clarity on the military laws. Also , we want to give a new face of the military side of our country , with more protection , and more interest in it. Also , we have to bring more safety with the use of weapons. To reduce murders and mass murders , we have to renforce the law.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Veterans' Affairs |
Dedicated veterans' services
|
Guaranteed housing, healthcare, pensions for veterans
|
|
| 2 | Autonomous Weapons Systems |
Autonomous systems for defence only
|
Permitted with mandatory human control
|
|
| 3 | Nuclear Weapons |
Retain weapons, pledge no first use
|
Maintain a minimal deterrent
|
|
| 4 | Firearms Control |
Licensed ownership with background checks
|
Strict licensing, limited categories
|
Party
A party that wants to bring freedom , peace , and a new vision of the political life. New generations bring the greatest changements.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 44
Henrietta Harrington spent two decades cultivating relationships in the halls of power, leveraging her sharp media insights to protect the party’s reputation—even when her own stuttering voice threatened to undermine her.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 129 / 520 seats (24.8%)
Against: 154 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 237
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | 129 | Yes | parfait projet bonne chance |
| Structural Centrist Academic Conference | 154 | No | As the party that builds on peace, we're out of stance on these proposals. |
For: 10 / 50 seats (20.0%)
Against: 9 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 31
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Parti Communiste Révolutionnaire | 10 | Yes | parfait projet bonne chance |
| Structural Centrist Academic Conference | 9 | No | As the party that builds on peace, we're out of stance on these proposals. |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“As the party that builds on peace, we're out of stance on these proposals.”
“parfait projet bonne chance”