“Protections are bad, but bans are much worse.”
Strike Ban Proposal Act of 2023
Rationale
Banning strikes ensures essential services remain uninterrupted, protecting public health, safety, and economic stability during critical operations.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Right to Strike |
Protected with a lawful ballot
|
Strikes effectively banned
|
1
Right to StrikeProposer
Party
Progressive Future
The Progressive Future builds unshakable nations where tradition stands tall and prosperity flows without limit.
Core pillars
Maxime Richard
Activist · Age 54
A former investigative journalist turned politician, Maxime Richard built his reputation exposing corruption, earning trust through his relentless pursuit of truth and unshakable moral compass.
Timeline
-
Draft8 March 2023
-
Vote Open8 March 2023
-
Vote Closed7 May 2023
-
Did Not Become Law7 May 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 0 / 200 seats (0.0%)
Against: 103 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 97
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 103 | No | Protections are bad, but bans are much worse. |
| Progressive Future Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 0 / 200 seats (0.0%)
Against: 69 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 131
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 69 | No | Protections are bad, but bans are much worse. |
| Progressive Future Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 41 | Not voted |
Consulate
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1