These reforms strengthen national security and social cohesion by prioritizing rapid removal of threats, ensuring newcomers align with core values, and preventing misuse of asylum systems for economic gain.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Automatic removal, limited appeals
|
|
| 2 | Integration Requirements |
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Strict language + values tests, mandatory classes
|
|
| 3 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
"Asylum seekers are economic migrants" - asylum claims closed
|
Party
The Progressive Future builds unshakable nations where tradition stands tall and prosperity flows without limit.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 36
A bestselling economist and media darling, Marguerite Muller parlayed her sharp policy mind and star power into a cult following, using her influence to propel the party’s secular and educational reforms while ascending the ranks.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 140 / 200 seats (70.0%)
Against: 98 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 0 | Yes | Article 2 is questionable for the purposes of government overreach and the like, but Articles 1 and 3 are massive improvements. |
| Democratic Union | 98 | No | That's not in line with human rights. |
| Progressive Future Proposer | 140 | Yes | No reason given |
For: 94 / 200 seats (47.0%)
Against: 65 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 41
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 0 | Yes | Article 2 is questionable for the purposes of government overreach and the like, but Articles 1 and 3 are massive improvements. |
| Democratic Union | 65 | No | That's not in line with human rights. |
| Progressive Future Proposer | 94 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 41 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Union | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“That's not in line with human rights.”
“Article 2 is questionable for the purposes of government overreach and the like, but Articles 1 and 3 are massive improvements.”