“It is an excellent plan for reducing delinquency and unemployment, as well as enhancing security and creating jobs.”
Stricter Immigration Enforcement Act of 2023
Rationale
These changes strengthen border security and public safety by prioritizing swift removal of threats, fair asylum processing offshore, and controlled immigration to protect national interests.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Automatic removal, limited appeals
|
|
| 2 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Offshore processing and detention
|
|
| 3 | Immigration Quota Policy |
No quotas, open immigration
|
Severely limited immigration
|
1
Deportation2
Asylum & Refugees3
Immigration Quota PolicyProposer
Party
Progressive Future
The Progressive Future builds unshakable nations where tradition stands tall and prosperity flows without limit.
Core pillars
Océane Thomas
Activist · Age 44
A 32-year-old academic firebrand whose sharp policy mind and relentless networking have made her a rising star in radical circles, often alienating moderates while rallying young idealists to her cause.
Timeline
-
Draft9 June 2023
-
Vote Open15 November 2023
-
Vote Closed14 January 2024
-
Did Not Become Law14 January 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
FailedFor: 71 / 200 seats (35.5%)
Against: 174 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 93 | No | We simply cannot vote in favor of something that creates unncessary government presence. |
| Democratic Union | 81 | No | It's a violation of human rights. |
| Monarchists | 0 | Yes | It is an excellent plan for reducing delinquency and unemployment, as well as enhancing security and creating jobs. |
| Progressive Future Proposer | 71 | Yes | No reason given |
National Assembly
FailedFor: 47 / 200 seats (23.5%)
Against: 116 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 37
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 62 | No | We simply cannot vote in favor of something that creates unncessary government presence. |
| Democratic Union | 54 | No | It's a violation of human rights. |
| Monarchists | 0 | Yes | It is an excellent plan for reducing delinquency and unemployment, as well as enhancing security and creating jobs. |
| Progressive Future Proposer | 47 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 41 | Not voted |
Consulate
FailedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 1 | No | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“It's a violation of human rights.”
“We simply cannot vote in favor of something that creates unncessary government presence.”