These changes prioritize measurable housing supply, economic fairness, and secular governance to meet urgent national needs while reducing inefficiencies and religious favoritism.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Housing Supply & Planning |
Balanced planning system
|
Strong national housing targets
|
|
| 2 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Public ownership of natural monopolies
|
|
| 3 | Religious Observation Policy |
Compulsory weekly worship attendance enforced by law
|
Permit religion with no state support (neutral tax treatment; no grants)
|
Party
A party for those who build tomorrow not from fear but from the unshakable belief that shared strength lifts all.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 48
Once a disillusioned economist teaching in a provincial university, Raphaël’s papers on systemic inequality catapulted him into politics, where his relentless ambition and fiery rhetoric now threaten to either revolutionize the system—or burn it all down.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 191 / 200 seats (95.5%)
Against: 103 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 103 | No | As much as we support 3, we could never support the disgusting authoritarian communism of Articles 1 and 2. |
| Common Future Proposer | 191 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Future | 0 | No | Article 1 2 and 3 would destroy the country do we want this for our future absolutely not |
For: 127 / 200 seats (63.5%)
Against: 69 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 4
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 69 | No | As much as we support 3, we could never support the disgusting authoritarian communism of Articles 1 and 2. |
| Common Future Proposer | 127 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Future | 0 | No | Article 1 2 and 3 would destroy the country do we want this for our future absolutely not |
| Empty seats | 41 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Article 1 2 and 3 would destroy the country do we want this for our future absolutely not”
“As much as we support 3, we could never support the disgusting authoritarian communism of Articles 1 and 2.”