These changes promote secular governance and inclusivity by ending state-enforced religion and language discrimination, fostering equal rights and social cohesion.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Religious Observation Policy |
Compulsory weekly worship attendance enforced by law
|
Permit religion with no state support (neutral tax treatment; no grants)
|
|
| 2 | Official Language Policy |
Ban other languages in schools and government services
|
Single official language for all official documents and courts
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 245 / 200 seats (122.5%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 93 | Yes | Article 2 is a problem since there shouldn't be any government services, period, but Article 1 is too good to pass up on. |
| Democratic Union Proposer | 81 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Future | 71 | Yes | We should allow people to speak their own native language |
For: 163 / 200 seats (81.5%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 37
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 62 | Yes | Article 2 is a problem since there shouldn't be any government services, period, but Article 1 is too good to pass up on. |
| Democratic Union Proposer | 54 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Future | 47 | Yes | We should allow people to speak their own native language |
| Empty seats | 41 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Article 2 is a problem since there shouldn't be any government services, period, but Article 1 is too good to pass up on.”
“We should allow people to speak their own native language”