“We believe that young people should love the country and singing the national anthem it in schools bringing them to love the country more so why should we take away the rights for singing a national pride”
Modernisation of Education of 2023
Royal veto exercised
Rationale
Modernize education by reducing ceremonies, raising school age for skills, limiting faith bias, and empowering tech-smart teaching for all.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | School Leaving Age |
Compulsory to 16
|
Compulsory education/training to 18
|
|
| 2 | State-Funded Faith Schools |
Permit existing state-funded faith schools
|
No new state-funded faith schools
|
|
| 3 | Mobile Phones in Schools |
Restricted to break times
|
Left to teacher discretion
|
|
| 4 | National Anthem in Schools |
Mandatory daily anthem (all students present; opt-out only for documented reasons)
|
No anthem in schools (civics taught without ceremonies)
|
1
School Leaving Age2
State-Funded Faith Schools3
Mobile Phones in Schools4
National Anthem in SchoolsProposer
Party
Common Future
A party for those who build tomorrow not from fear but from the unshakable belief that shared strength lifts all.
Core pillars
Raphaël Roussel
Activist · Age 48
Once a disillusioned economist teaching in a provincial university, Raphaël’s papers on systemic inequality catapulted him into politics, where his relentless ambition and fiery rhetoric now threaten to either revolutionize the system—or burn it all down.
Timeline
-
Draft23 February 2023
-
Vote Open23 February 2023
-
Vote Closed24 April 2023
-
Did Not Become Law24 April 2023
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
Senate
PassedFor: 191 / 200 seats (95.5%)
Against: 103 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 103 | No | Articles 2 and 4 are unacceptable. 3 and 1 would be okay but only under the right circumstances. |
| Common Future Proposer | 191 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Future | 0 | No | We believe that young people should love the country and singing the national anthem it in schools bringing them to love the country more so why should we take away the rights for singing a national pride |
National Assembly
PassedFor: 127 / 200 seats (63.5%)
Against: 69 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 4
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League | 69 | No | Articles 2 and 4 are unacceptable. 3 and 1 would be okay but only under the right circumstances. |
| Common Future Proposer | 127 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Future | 0 | No | We believe that young people should love the country and singing the national anthem it in schools bringing them to love the country more so why should we take away the rights for singing a national pride |
| Empty seats | 41 | Not voted |
Consulate
PassedFor: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We care a lot about people's future so we're wondering why should the education system be left in the past”
“Articles 2 and 4 are unacceptable. 3 and 1 would be okay but only under the right circumstances.”