These reforms prioritise personal freedom and reduce state coercion, cutting costs and empowering communities through ethical and efficient governance.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Military Service Policy |
Total war footing (all adults 18-60 subject to military call-up at any time)
|
Abolish the military entirely; pacifist state
|
|
| 2 | Police Powers |
Martial law (military policing; shoot-on-sight authorised for curfew violations)
|
Abolish police; communities handle their own disputes
|
|
| 3 | Social Care for the Elderly |
Capped lifetime care costs
|
Care is the family's responsibility
|
|
| 4 | Public Ownership of Key Industries |
Private, with strong regulation
|
Full privatisation, market discipline
|
|
| 5 | Homeschooling Regulation |
Homeschooling allowed with curriculum standards, testing, and inspections
|
No compulsory education; families decide whether children are schooled at all
|
Party
Founded in the midst of the Great Anarchy, we aim to preserve this glorious time with no government! The people of Kalpetia shall be unoppressed! Viva la Revolution!
Core pillars
Activist · Age 27
A former underground anarchist pamphleteer turned firebrand agitator, Françoise Bertrand’s radical methods earned her a reputation as the movement’s most fearless enforcer—even among her own ranks.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 0 / 200 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 200
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Citizen's Movement | 0 | No | We reject this proposal |
For: 0 / 200 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 200
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anarchist League Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Progressive Citizen's Movement | 0 | No | We reject this proposal |
| Empty seats | 41 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 1
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“We reject this proposal”