Proposed by National Front Of Javosca in Javosca
Opening this package cost 75 PP.
Current wording is shown as it was when voting began.
This is absurd, and entrenched.
For: 64 / 245 seats (26.1%) — needs 60.0%
Against: 103 · Abstained: 78 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 27 | Abstain | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 64 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 51 | Abstain | You make a very stale argument and in some ways vetos are good. Im gonna abstain from this vote and let everyone else decide |
| Red Green Labor | 103 | No | The post of the president is specially for the veto sorry we can't support this |
For: 141 / 543 seats (26.0%) — needs 60.0%
Against: 228 · Abstained: 174 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javoscan Social Alliance "future" | 61 | Abstain | No reason given |
| National Front Of Javosca Proposer | 141 | Yes | No reason given |
| Peoples Progressional Front | 113 | Abstain | You make a very stale argument and in some ways vetos are good. Im gonna abstain from this vote and let everyone else decide |
| Red Green Labor | 228 | No | The post of the president is specially for the veto sorry we can't support this |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The post of the president is specially for the veto sorry we can't support this”
“You make a very stale argument and in some ways vetos are good. Im gonna abstain from this vote and let everyone else decide”