“Sure, why not vote yes”
Workplace Efficiency Act of 2024
Rationale
These reforms modernize labor policies to boost productivity, attract investment, and reduce unemployment while maintaining worker protections.
Proposed Changes
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maximum Working Hours |
40-hour weekly maximum with overtime controls
|
48-hour weekly maximum
|
|
| 2 | Minimum Wage Policy |
No minimum wage
|
Basic minimum wage
|
|
| 3 | Paid Sick Leave |
Employers must pay statutory sick pay
|
Unpaid but job-protected sick leave
|
|
| 4 | Paid Annual Leave |
~4 weeks statutory paid leave
|
Minimal statutory leave
|
1
Maximum Working Hours2
Minimum Wage Policy3
Paid Sick Leave4
Paid Annual LeaveProposer
Party
Technocratic Union
Following a split from the Socialist Planning Association, The Technocratic Union (TU) builds prosperity not through ideology but through expertise, where data and analysis forge decision making towards tomorrow's nation.
Core pillars
Marcus Stewart
Secretary of the Treasury · Age 44
A silver-tongued heir to an industrial fortune, his charismatic speeches and media savvy have made him the public face of reform, though critics question whether his wealth undermines his ideals.
Timeline
-
Draft5 February 2024
-
Vote Open5 February 2024
-
Vote Closed5 April 2024
-
Became Law5 April 2024
Vote tally
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
House Of Commons
PassedFor: 136 / 240 seats (56.7%)
Against: 65 · Abstained: 25 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty | 25 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Iron Pillars | 23 | Yes | Looks good to me helps the economy a little. |
| Labour | 65 | No | Absolutely not. This is why we kept blocking your legislation, not because of personal conflict, but because you think that this will be good. |
| National Conservative | 26 | Yes | Sure, why not vote yes |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | No | Bizarre. Definitely out of common sense |
| Technocratic Union Proposer | 87 | Yes | No reason given |
House Of Representatives
PassedFor: 36 / 48 seats (75.0%)
Against: 5 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty | 0 | Abstain | No reason given |
| Iron Pillars | 10 | Yes | Looks good to me helps the economy a little. |
| Labour | 5 | No | Absolutely not. This is why we kept blocking your legislation, not because of personal conflict, but because you think that this will be good. |
| National Conservative | 9 | Yes | Sure, why not vote yes |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | No | Bizarre. Definitely out of common sense |
| Technocratic Union Proposer | 17 | Yes | No reason given |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
Prime Minister
PassedFor: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Voting record
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Absolutely not. This is why we kept blocking your legislation, not because of personal conflict, but because you think that this will be good.”
“Looks good to me helps the economy a little.”
“Bizarre. Definitely out of common sense”