These changes modernize labor and education laws to boost economic flexibility and parental choice while maintaining safety standards.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maximum Working Hours |
Mandatory four-day work week (28 hours maximum)
|
No statutory limit on working hours
|
|
| 2 | Homeschooling Regulation |
Homeschooling prohibited; all children must attend licensed schools
|
Homeschooling allowed with curriculum standards, testing, and inspections
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 74 / 240 seats (30.8%)
Against: 152 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance Proposer | 25 | Yes | No reason given |
| Iron Pillars | 23 | Yes | Very good for the economy and a good education system. |
| Labour | 65 | No | This is a ridiculous proposal |
| National Conservative | 26 | Yes | Very good for the economy |
| Technocratic Union | 87 | No | We support the no limit on working hours but our youth should be put through the education system |
For: 19 / 48 seats (39.6%)
Against: 22 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Iron Pillars | 10 | Yes | Very good for the economy and a good education system. |
| Labour | 5 | No | This is a ridiculous proposal |
| National Conservative | 9 | Yes | Very good for the economy |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | No | We support the no limit on working hours but our youth should be put through the education system |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is a ridiculous proposal”
“Very good for the economy”
“We support the no limit on working hours but our youth should be put through the education system”
“Very good for the economy and a good education system.”