These changes modernize labor, public health, education, and immigration policies to reduce costs, enforce stricter personal responsibility, and align with minimal legal requirements.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paid Annual Leave |
6+ weeks statutory paid leave
|
~4 weeks statutory paid leave
|
|
| 2 | Tobacco & Vaping Regulation |
Heavy restrictions (plain packaging; indoor ban; age 21; advertising banned)
|
Total ban on tobacco and vaping products; possession criminalized
|
|
| 3 | State-Funded Faith Schools |
State funds secular schools only
|
Permit existing state-funded faith schools
|
|
| 4 | Asylum & Refugees |
Generous resettlement and support
|
Meet international obligations only
|
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 74 / 240 seats (30.8%)
Against: 152 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 14
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance | 25 | Yes | We support this bill to enhance economic competitiveness and fiscal responsibility. Reducing mandatory paid leave eases operational burdens on businesses, while streamlining asylum spending ensures public resources are managed efficiently. This approach encourages personal responsibility while maintaining essential international obligations. |
| Iron Pillars Proposer | 23 | Yes | No reason given |
| Labour | 65 | No | We built this welfare state, and we will not tear it down |
| National Conservative | 26 | Yes | We the national conservative party support our allies in the figth for common desency and an better, conservative future |
| Technocratic Union | 87 | No | The package mixes one defensible efficiency reform with several ideologically-driven, evidence-poor changes, so it fails net cost-benefit scrutiny as a bundle. |
For: 19 / 48 seats (39.6%)
Against: 22 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance | 0 | Yes | We support this bill to enhance economic competitiveness and fiscal responsibility. Reducing mandatory paid leave eases operational burdens on businesses, while streamlining asylum spending ensures public resources are managed efficiently. This approach encourages personal responsibility while maintaining essential international obligations. |
| Iron Pillars Proposer | 10 | Yes | No reason given |
| Labour | 5 | No | We built this welfare state, and we will not tear it down |
| National Conservative | 9 | Yes | We the national conservative party support our allies in the figth for common desency and an better, conservative future |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | No | The package mixes one defensible efficiency reform with several ideologically-driven, evidence-poor changes, so it fails net cost-benefit scrutiny as a bundle. |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars Proposer | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“The package mixes one defensible efficiency reform with several ideologically-driven, evidence-poor changes, so it fails net cost-benefit scrutiny as a bundle.”
“We built this welfare state, and we will not tear it down”
“We support this bill to enhance economic competitiveness and fiscal responsibility. Reducing mandatory paid leave eases operational burdens on businesses, while streamlining asylum spending ensures public resources are managed efficiently. This approach encourages personal responsibility while maintaining essential international obligations.”
“We the national conservative party support our allies in the figth for common desency and an better, conservative future”