These changes strengthen national security and social cohesion by prioritizing stricter controls on asylum, citizenship, and immigration while ensuring integration.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asylum & Refugees |
Meet international obligations only
|
Strict processing, limited support
|
|
| 2 | Citizenship Requirements |
Citizenship by birth; naturalisation after 2 years' residency
|
Citizenship by blood only (jus sanguinis); 15-year residency for naturalisation
|
|
| 3 | Deportation |
Case-by-case with full appeal rights
|
Firm enforcement with appeals
|
|
| 4 | Immigration Quota Policy |
No quotas, open immigration
|
Severely limited immigration
|
|
| 5 | Integration Requirements |
Light-touch, support-based integration
|
Standard language/civics requirements
|
Party
The National Conservative Party stands guard over tradition law and faith with iron will and unshaken roots.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 37
A former high-flying banker who left finance after witnessing firsthand the corrosive effects of unchecked liberal policies, Henry Wilson traded spreadsheets for stump speeches, using his financial acumen and silver-tongued charm to rally disillusioned voters around pragmatic solutions.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 49 / 240 seats (20.4%)
Against: 65 · Abstained: 58 · Not voted: 68
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 23 | Yes | Looks good especially the immigration. |
| Labour | 65 | No | This aims to restrict access to immigration entirely. What would happen when we don't have required scientists and the youth emigrates because of high living costs? Pick one, not both. |
| National Conservative Proposer | 26 | Yes | The youth only emigrates because the economy was so regulated, thanks to my deregulations it wont |
| Technocratic Union | 58 | Abstain | This is not a horrible bill we just feel this is too much to pass in one bill and can't support the whole thing |
For: 19 / 48 seats (39.6%)
Against: 5 · Abstained: 17 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 10 | Yes | Looks good especially the immigration. |
| Labour | 5 | No | This aims to restrict access to immigration entirely. What would happen when we don't have required scientists and the youth emigrates because of high living costs? Pick one, not both. |
| National Conservative Proposer | 9 | Yes | The youth only emigrates because the economy was so regulated, thanks to my deregulations it wont |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | Abstain | This is not a horrible bill we just feel this is too much to pass in one bill and can't support the whole thing |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“This is not a horrible bill we just feel this is too much to pass in one bill and can't support the whole thing”
“Looks good especially the immigration.”
“The youth only emigrates because the economy was so regulated, thanks to my deregulations it wont”
“This aims to restrict access to immigration entirely. What would happen when we don't have required scientists and the youth emigrates because of high living costs? Pick one, not both.”