These changes prioritize public safety, enforce fairness, and ensure resilience in crises by tightening rules where risks are high and allocating resources where they matter most.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Drink & Drug Driving |
Standard legal alcohol limit; roadside drug testing
|
Near-zero alcohol limit, roadside drug testing and automatic driving bans
|
|
| 2 | Homelessness |
Guaranteed housing-first support
|
Mix of support and enforcement
|
|
| 3 | Tourist Visa Policy |
Visa for most nationalities through a standard e-visa process
|
Visa-free entry for allied and reciprocal countries
|
|
| 4 | Water Usage & Allocation |
Abstraction licences for large users
|
Legal priority order in shortages: households first, farms and industry rationed
|
|
| 5 | Vehicle Emissions Standards |
Emissions limits with gradual phase-in for new vehicles
|
No vehicle emissions standards whatsoever
|
Party
The party of boundless horizons where ambition meets liberty and prosperity knows no limits.Freedom is the first right
Core pillars
Activist · Age 29
A former special forces officer turned firebrand politician, Gordon Thomas channels his military discipline and media savvy into fiery speeches while climbing the ranks with relentless ambition and a knack for public persuasion.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 20 / 240 seats (8.3%)
Against: 162 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 58
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty Proposer | 20 | Yes | No reason given |
| Iron Pillars | 33 | No | No needed as of now. |
| Labour | 66 | No | This proposal, while good in intention, still continues to have some problems |
| National Conservative | 0 | No | This is not needed ever |
| Nationalist Future | 19 | No | No, it contains some problems |
| Technocratic Union | 44 | No | It's good in theory but so many small issues |
For: 0 / 48 seats (0.0%)
Against: 32 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 16
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Liberty Proposer | 0 | Yes | No reason given |
| Iron Pillars | 10 | No | No needed as of now. |
| Labour | 5 | No | This proposal, while good in intention, still continues to have some problems |
| National Conservative | 0 | No | This is not needed ever |
| Nationalist Future | 0 | No | No, it contains some problems |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | No | It's good in theory but so many small issues |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
For: 0 / 1 seats (0.0%)
Against: 1 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Cunningham | 1 | No | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“No needed as of now.”
“It's good in theory but so many small issues”
“This is not needed ever”
“This proposal, while good in intention, still continues to have some problems”
“No, it contains some problems”