To strengthen public safety by enabling decisive, high-risk policing against escalating violent crime and terrorism threats.
| Law | Previous | Proposed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armed Police |
Mostly unarmed; specialist armed units on call
|
Police routinely carry military-grade weapons
|
|
| 2 | Police Powers |
Community policing focused on prevention
|
Martial law (military policing; shoot-on-sight authorised for curfew violations)
|
Party
The National Conservative Party stands guard over tradition law and faith with iron will and unshaken roots.
Core pillars
Activist · Age 37
A former high-flying banker who left finance after witnessing firsthand the corrosive effects of unchecked liberal policies, Henry Wilson traded spreadsheets for stump speeches, using his financial acumen and silver-tongued charm to rally disillusioned voters around pragmatic solutions.
Live tally across each chamber. Weighted by seats held.
For: 72 / 240 seats (30.0%)
Against: 153 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 15
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance | 0 | No | While we support maintaining public order, imposing martial law and authorizing shoot-on-sight procedures for curfew violations severely breaches constitutional due process and the rule of law. A conservative government must preserve fundamental civil liberties against extreme state overreach. |
| Iron Pillars | 33 | Yes | Looks good to me we need more security especially with labour around. |
| Labour | 55 | No | National Conservative Party has gotten out of their minds! The Police is a civilian force, not a military one. |
| National Conservative Proposer | 39 | Yes | No reason given |
| Technocratic Union | 98 | No | Shoot-on-sight martial law is an extreme escalation disproportionate to the stated threat |
For: 19 / 48 seats (39.6%)
Against: 22 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 7
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Alliance | 0 | No | While we support maintaining public order, imposing martial law and authorizing shoot-on-sight procedures for curfew violations severely breaches constitutional due process and the rule of law. A conservative government must preserve fundamental civil liberties against extreme state overreach. |
| Iron Pillars | 10 | Yes | Looks good to me we need more security especially with labour around. |
| Labour | 5 | No | National Conservative Party has gotten out of their minds! The Police is a civilian force, not a military one. |
| National Conservative Proposer | 9 | Yes | No reason given |
| Technocratic Union | 17 | No | Shoot-on-sight martial law is an extreme escalation disproportionate to the stated threat |
| Empty seats | 16 | Not voted |
For: 1 / 1 seats (100.0%)
Against: 0 · Abstained: 0 · Not voted: 0
| Party | Seats | Vote | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Pillars | 1 | Yes | No reason given |
Every vote must state a public reason. Most recent first.
“Shoot-on-sight martial law is an extreme escalation disproportionate to the stated threat”
“Looks good to me we need more security especially with labour around.”
“National Conservative Party has gotten out of their minds! The Police is a civilian force, not a military one.”
“While we support maintaining public order, imposing martial law and authorizing shoot-on-sight procedures for curfew violations severely breaches constitutional due process and the rule of law. A conservative government must preserve fundamental civil liberties against extreme state overreach.”